Politická ekonomie 2003, 51(4):505-515 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.413

Převzetí eura: brzda nebo motor reálné konvergence?

Oldřich Dědek
Česká národní banka, Praha.

Adoption of euro: obstacle or engine of real convergence?

The article arrives to the following conclusions. First, the optimal currency area theory cannot deliver critical (objective) values of tests, whose passing would guarantee that costs of adoption of euro would be lower than the benefits. Second, several empirical observations strongly support the hypothesis that early adoption of euro by the Czech Republic would not incur any substantial losses. Third, several recent studies focused on testing the synchronisation of Czech business cycle vis-à-vis Eurozone do apply analytical techniques inappropriately, which implies biased results. Fourth, the Czech economy has enough experience with excessively volatile exchange rate. The greatest advantage of adoption of euro will consist in a replacement of exchange rate fluctuations and substantially higher stability of inflation. In quantitative terms, the weight of accession countries in Eurozone will be too small to influence the overall inflation and thus co-determine the European Central Bank monetary policy.

Keywords: optimum currency area, real convergence, adoption of euro, cost-benefit analysis, real appreciation
JEL classification: F31, F32, F33, F41

Published: August 1, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dědek, O. (2003). Adoption of euro: obstacle or engine of real convergence? Politická ekonomie51(4), 505-515. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.413
Download citation

References

  1. Čihák, M., Holub, T.: Cenová konvergence k EU - pár nezodpovězených otázek. Finance a úvěr, 2001, č. 6, s. 331-349.
  2. Dědek, O.: Výzvy nominální a reálné konvergence. Politická ekonomie, 2001, č. 6, s. 755-769. Go to original source...
  3. Dědek, O.: Česká ekonomika a euro. Politická ekonomie, 2002, č. 3, s. 361-375. Go to original source...
  4. Dědek, O.: Euro pro českou ekonomiku: spíše dříve než později. In: Měnová politika a příchod eura. Praha, Centrum pro ekonomiku a politiku 2002, č. 16, s. 29-34.
  5. Grauwe, De P.: The Economics of Monetary Integration. Oxford, Oxford University Press 1994.
  6. Gross, D., Thygesen, N.: European Monetary Integration. London, Longman 1992.
  7. Hochreiter, E., Winckler, G.: The Advantages of Tying Austria's Hands: The Success of the Hard Currency Strategy. European Economic Review, 1961, s. 657-665.
  8. Janáčková, S.: Rozšiřování Eurozóny: některá rizika pro dohánějící země. Politická ekonomie, 2002, č. 6, s. 759-779. Go to original source...
  9. Krugman, P.: Crises: The Price of Globalization? In: Global Economic Integration: Opportunities and Challenges. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2000, s. 75-106.
  10. Lipschitz, L., Lane, T., Mourmouras, A.: The Tošovský Dilemma: Capital Surges in Transition Countries. Finance & Development, 2002, č. 3, s. 30-33.
  11. Mundell, R. A.: A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 1961, s. 657-665.
  12. Mundell, R. A.: Interview. Central Banking, 2002, č. 4, s. 19-26.
  13. Spěváček, V.: Parita kupní síly - nástroj mezinárodních srovnání. Politická ekonomie, 2003, č.1, s. 59-78. Go to original source...
  14. Szapáry, G.: Is Maastricht too tough? Central Banking, 2002, č. 1, s. 75-91.
  15. Vintrová, R.: Reálná konvergence - předpoklad plynulé integrace do Evropské unie. Politická ekonomie, 2003, č. 1, s. 79-91. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.