Politická ekonomie 2004, 52(1):74-90 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.451

Komparace tematické struktury časopiseckých publikací českých a evropských ekonomů (1999 - 2002)

Martin Macháček
Ekonomická fakulta Vysoké školy báňské - Technické univerzity, Ostrava.

Comparison of the thematic structure of journal articles by czech and european economists

The paper deals with the thematic structure of journal articles according to the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classification system. For this purpose, three representative periodicals from 1999 to 2002 are analysed by examining the publications by Czech and European economists. The research methodology is as follows. First, the institutional affiliation of the journals' contributors is identified by examining the information provided by the authors in their articles. Second, the JEL classification stated in the journals is investigated with respect to co-authorship issues and the relative significance of the multiple JEL codes. The results indicate that when compared to the rest of Europe, Czech economists prefer macroeconomic problems to the microeconomic ones and have a strong bias for the methodology and history of economic thought, as well as for the mathematical and quantitative methods. On the other hand, Czech researchers exhibit a markedly lower interest in labour and demographic economics.

Keywords: economic research, international comparisons, journal articles, thematic structure, institutional affiliation
JEL classification: A10, A14, A19

Published: February 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Macháček, M. (2004). Comparison of the thematic structure of journal articles by czech and european economists. Politická ekonomie52(1), 74-90. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.451
Download citation

References

  1. Bairam, E. I.: Communication: Institutional Affiliation of Contributors to Top Economic Journals, 1985-1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, č. 2, s. 361-373.
  2. Baumann, M. G., Werden, G. J., Williams, M. A.: Rankings of Economic Departments by Field. American Economist, 1987, č. 1, s. 56-61. Go to original source...
  3. Blair, D. W., Cottle, R. L., Wallace, M. S.: Faculty Ratings of Major Economics Departments by Citations: An Extension. American Economic Review, 1986, č. 1, s. 264-267.
  4. Blaug, M.: No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists. Journal of Political Economy, 2001, č. 1, s. 145-164. Go to original source...
  5. Coupé, T.: Revealed Performances: Worldwide Rankings of Economists and Economics Departments 1969-2000. European Center for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2002 (http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~tcoupe/ranking.html).
  6. Davis, P., Papanek, G. F.: Faculty Ratings of Major Economics Departments by Citations. American Economic Review, 1984, č. 1, s. 225-230.
  7. Diamond, A. M., Jr.: The Core Journals of Economics. Current Contents, 1989, č. 1, s. 4-11(a).
  8. Diamond, A. M., Jr.: Most-Cited Economics Papers and Current Research Fronts. Current Contents, 1989, č. 2, s. 8-11(b).
  9. Dusansky, R., Vernon, C. J.: Rankings of U.S. Economics Departments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, č. 1, s. 157-170. Go to original source...
  10. Elliott, C., Greenaway, D., Sapsford, D.: Who's Publishing Who? The National Composition of Contributors to Some Core US and European Journals. European Economic Review, 1998, č. 1, s. 201-206. Go to original source...
  11. Fletcher, J. (ed.): The Use of Economics Literature. London, Butterworths 1971.
  12. Jansen, D. W.: Ranking Federal Reserve System Research Departments by Publications in Professional Journals. Journal of Macroeconomics, 1991, č. 4, s. 733-742. Go to original source...
  13. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., Stengos, T.: European Economics: An Analysis Based on Publications in the Core Journals. European Economic Review, 1999, č. 4-6, s. 1150-1168. Go to original source...
  14. Klusoň, V.: Vzpomínky na budoucnost. Politická ekonomie, 2003, č. 1, s. 17-21.
  15. Laband, D. N.: Publishing Favoritism: A Critique of Departmental Rankings on Quantitative Publishing Performance. Southern Economic Journal, 1985, s. 510-515. Go to original source...
  16. Laband, D. N., Piette, M. J.: The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, č. 2, s. 640-666.
  17. Laband, D. N., Sophocleus, J. P.: Revealed Preferences for Economics Journals: Citations as Dollar Votes. Public Choice, 1985, s. 317-324. Go to original source...
  18. Laband, D. N., Tollison, R. D.: On Secondhandism and Scientific Appraisal. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2000, č. 1, s. 43-48. Go to original source...
  19. Liebowitz, S. J., Palmer, J. C.: Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 1984, č. 1, s. 77-88.
  20. Lucas, R. F.: Contributions to Economics Journals by the Canadian Economics Profession, 1981-1990. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1995, č. 4a, s. 949-960. Go to original source...
  21. Macháček, M.: Politická ekonomie 1999 - 2001: několik poznámek k tematické struktuře českého akademického periodika. In: Červenka, M., Kliková, Ch. (red.): Hospodářská politika v tranzitivních ekonomikách III. Ostrava, EkF VŠB-TU 2002, s. 225-235.
  22. McDowell, J., Amacher, R. C.: Economic Value of an In-House Editorship. Public Choice, 1986, č. 2, s. 101-112. Go to original source...
  23. Medoff, M. H.: The Ranking of Economists. Journal of Economic Education, 1989, č. 4, s. 405-415. Go to original source...
  24. Roční hodnocení výzkumného záměru řešeného v roce 2002 a vybraná publikační činnost. Ostrava, EkF VŠB-TU 2002.
  25. Stigler, G. J., Stigler, S. M., Friedland, C.: The Journals of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, č. 2, s. 331-359. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.