Politická ekonomie 2004, 52(4):433-447 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.468

Evropská měnová unie a rizika pro reálnou konvergenci

Kamil Janáček1, Stanislava Janáčková2
1 Komerční banka, a.s.
2 Kancelář prezidenta republiky, Praha

European monetary union and risks for real convergence

New members of the EU will not form an optimum currency area with the present eurozone member states. The article discusses some costs and benefits of an early EMU entry for the Czech Republic (and other Central-European economies). The authors concentrate on the consequences of loss of country-specific monetary policy, and of exchange-rate flexibility. They also stress the problem of finding the appropriate level at which to fix the exchange rate for both ERM-II and eurozone entry. The importance of both nominal and real convergence is underlined for a successful catch-up. The conclusion is that a "no hurry" policy for euro would be beneficial for a long-term catch-up process of the Czech Republic. Use of country-specific monetary policy is indispensable for real convergence.

Keywords: optimum currency area, adoption of euro, fiscal consolidation, convergence nominal and real, Maastricht criteria
JEL classification: E23, E31, E52, F15

Published: August 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janáček, K., & Janáčková, S. (2004). European monetary union and risks for real convergence. Politická ekonomie52(4), 433-447. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.468
Download citation

References

  1. Balcerowicz, L.: EU Enlargement and Catching Up. Referát na konferenci nových členských zemí From Accession to Adopting the Euro. Waršava, 21. listopad 2003.
  2. Bofinger, P.: Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area? London, CEPR 1994, Discussion Paper Series No. 915.
  3. Couhglan, A.: Some Reasons why Joining the Euro has Been a Mistake for the Republic of Ireland. The European Journal, 2003, č. 8
  4. Dědek, O.: Převzetí eura: brzda nebo motor reálné konvergence? Politická ekonomie, 2003, č. 4, s. 505-514. Go to original source...
  5. Eurostat News Release, 18 December 2003. Go to original source...
  6. Horvath, J.: Optimum Currency Area Theory: A Selective Review. Helsinki, Bank of Finland 2003, Discussion Papers No. 15. Go to original source...
  7. Inflation Differentials in the Euro Area: Potential Causes and Policy Implications. Frankfurt, European Central Bank 2003.
  8. Janáček, K.: New Member States and EMU. Economic Trends, 2003, No. 37 (www.kb.cz).
  9. Janáčková, S.: Rozšiřování eurozóny: některá rizika pro dohánějící země. Politická ekonomie, 2002, č. 6, s. 759-779. Go to original source...
  10. Janáčková, S.: The Chimera of Autonomous Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy. Eastern European Economics, 2001, č. 3, s. -.
  11. Klaus, V.: Euro a jeho budoucnost: pohled z budoucí členské země. Přednáška v CATO Institute. Washington D.C., 2003 (www.klaus.cz).
  12. Mandel, M., Tomšík, V.: Monetární ekonomie v malé otevřené ekonomice. Praha, Management Press 2003.
  13. Mundel, R. A..: A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 1961, s. 657-665.
  14. Návrh evropské ústavy.
  15. Prodi, R.: Interview pro CNN, 1. leden 2002.
  16. Strategie přistoupení České republiky k eurozóně. Praha, 2003 (www.cnb.cz).
  17. Süppel, R.: Comparing Economic Dynamics in the EU and CEE Accession Countries. Frank

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.