Politická ekonomie 2004, 52(4):465-481 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.470

Vliv přijetí Společné zemědělské politiky Evropské unie na rozvoj české ekonomiky

Tomáš Ratinger, Zdeněk Toušek
1 Výzkumný ústav zemědělské ekonomiky, Praha.
2 Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze.

The adoption effect of Common agricultural policy of the European union at development of the czech economy

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate some economywide effects of the adoption of Common Agricultural Policy. The general equilibrium approach is applied. The model is designed as a static computable general equilibrium one. The model structure reflects basic neoclassical assumption, i.e. producers maximize their profit and consumers maximize utility while the government wishes to balance its budget. The scenarios follow the debate about the extent of CAP available for candidate countries. Selected macro and sectoral economic indicators are used to assess the magnitude of scenarios impacts on the national economy. Model simulations indicate that positive aspects of accession prevail over negative ones in the most respects.

Keywords: common agricultural policy, EU enlargement, general equilibrium model, agrarian sector
JEL classification: Q01, Q11, Q18

Published: August 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ratinger, T., & Toušek, Z. (2004). The adoption effect of Common agricultural policy of the European union at development of the czech economy. Politická ekonomie52(4), 465-481. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.470
Download citation

References

  1. Banse, M., Tangermann, S.: Central and Eastern European Agriculture in Expanding European Union. Wallingford, CAB International 2000. Go to original source...
  2. Bulletin VÚZE, 1999, č. 10. Go to original source...
  3. Diewert,W. E., Wales, T. J.: Normalized Quadratic Systems of Consumer Demand Functions. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1988, s. 303-312. Go to original source...
  4. Diewert, W. E., Wales, T. J.: Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions.' Econometrica, 1987, s. 43-68. Go to original source...
  5. Doucha, T. a kol.: Ekonomické dopady přijetí SZP EU. Praha, RASES při vládě ČR 2002 (www.vuze.cz).
  6. Doucha, T. a kol.: Analýza úrovně celní ochrany 1999 (www.vuze.cz).
  7. Frandsen, S. a kol.: Expanding Fortress Europe: Implications of European Enlargement for Non-member Regions. Copenhagen, Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics 1998.
  8. EK: Information Note - Common Financial Framework 2004 - 2006 for the Accession Negociations. Brussel, 2002.
  9. Goulder, L. H., Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J.: Domestic Tax Policy and the Foreign Sector: the Importance of Alternative Foreign Policy Formulations to Results from a General Equilibrium Tax Analysis Model. In: Feldstein, M. S. (ed.): Behavioral Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis. Chicago, University of Chicago Press 1983, s. -. Go to original source...
  10. Gunning, J. W., Keyzer, M. A.: Applied General Equilibrium Model for Policy Analysis. In: Behrman, J., Srinivasan, T. N. (ed.): Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. IIIA). Amsterdam, 1995, s. 2025-2107. Go to original source...
  11. Herok, C. A., Lotze, H.: Implications of an EU Eastrern Enlargement Under a New Common Agricultural Policy. West Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue University 1998.
  12. Hertel, T. W.: Global Trade Analysis: Modelling and Applications. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press 1997.
  13. Hertel, T. W., Brockmeier, M. A., Swaminathan, P.: Sectoral and Economywide Analysis of Integrating CEEC into the European Union: Implications of Alternative Strategies. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1997, s. 54-69. Go to original source...
  14. Chambers, R. G.: Production Economics. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press 1988.
  15. Jensen, H. et al.: Agricultural and Economic-Wide Effects of European Enlargement: Modelling the Common Agricultural Policy. Copenhagen, Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics 1998.
  16. Liapis, P. S., Tsigas, M. E.: CEEC Accession to the EU: A Genaral Equilibrium Analysis. In: Burfisher, M. E., Jones, E. A. (eds.): Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture. USDA 1998 (Agricultural Economics Report No 771).
  17. Peterson, E. B.: A General Equilibrium Framework for the Food Marketing Systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1994, s. 3-48. Go to original source...
  18. Salter, W.: Internal and External Balance: The Role of Price and Expenditure Effects. Economic Record, 1959, s. 226-238. Go to original source...
  19. Samuelson, P. A.: Prices of Factors and Goods in General Equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 1953-54, s. 1-20. Go to original source...
  20. Schoemaker, P. J. H.: Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Rewiev, 1950, s. 25-40.
  21. Swaminathan, P.: Integration of the Central and Eastern European Economies into the European Union. In: Swaminathan, P. et al.: Economic Transition and the Greening of Policies: Modelling New Challenges for Agriculture and Agribusiness in Europe. Kiel, Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk 1998, s. -.
  22. Swan, T.: Economic Control in Dependent Economy. Economic Record, 1960, s. 51-66. Go to original source...
  23. Tangermann, S., Münch, W.: Agriculture in Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republic and Hungary and Possible Evaluation in the Medium Term - Using the ESIM Sectoral Model. Zpráva pro Evropskou komisi (DG VI) 1995.
  24. Varian, H. R.: Microeconomic Analysis. New York, WW Norton and Company Inc. 1992.
  25. Weyerbrock, S.: East-West Integration in Europe: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Bud- getary and Trade Implications. Toronto, AAEA 1997.
  26. Zprávy o stavu zemědělství. Praha, Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR 1994 - 2001.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.