Politická ekonomie 2005, 53(3):337-347 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.509

Nerovnováha na trhu práce jako důsledek racionálního chování (model substitučního vztahu mezi výší mzdy a kvalitou monitoringu)

Julie Chytilová
Fakulta sociálních věd UK, Praha.

Non-clearing equilibrium on the labour market as a consequence of rational behaviour (model of trade-off between wage level and monitoring)

One of the employer's problems in his relationship to the employee is limited enforceability of work-quality. There are two types of instruments: the employer has at hand while motivating employees for higher efficiency - higher wage as a carrot and monitoring as a stick. These two instruments can be mutually substitutable. The more costly the supervision is, the more convenient for the employer is to substitute it by the wage increase. The key determinant for wage level of individual employee is not only the labour productivity, which is usually considered, but the degree of monitoring costs as well. The above mentioned approach allows us to explain the existence of above-equilibrium wage level in the environment of rational behaviour. We are not dealing with a market failure, the employers maximize their profits. As a consequence there is involuntary unemployment on the labour market persisting in the long-run.

Keywords: unemployment, wages, efficiency wage models, monitoring
JEL classification: J30, J41, J60

Published: June 1, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chytilová, J. (2005). Non-clearing equilibrium on the labour market as a consequence of rational behaviour (model of trade-off between wage level and monitoring). Politická ekonomie53(3), 337-347. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.509
Download citation

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A.: Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982, s. 543-569. Go to original source...
  2. Bliss, C., Stern, N.: Productivity, Wages and Nutrition. Journal of Development Economics, 1978, s. 331-398. Go to original source...
  3. Dasgupta, P., Ray, D.: Inequality as a Determinant of Malnutrition and Unemployment. Economic Journal, 1987, s. 177-188. Go to original source...
  4. Ewing, B. T., Payne, J. E.: The Trade-off between Supervision and Wages: Evidence of Efficiency Wages from the NLSY. Southern Economic Journal, 1999, s. 424-432. Go to original source...
  5. Ewing, B. T., Wunnava, P. V.: The Trade-off between Supervision Cost and Performance Based Pay: Does Gender Matter? Middlebury College Economics, 2002 (Discussion Paper No. 02-32).
  6. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H.: Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, č. 4, s. 305-360. Go to original source...
  7. Lazear, E. P.: Incentive Contracts. Cambridge, MA, NBER 1986 (Working Paper No. 1917). Go to original source...
  8. Lazear, E. P., Rosen, S.: Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, s. 841-864. Go to original source...
  9. Rebitzer, J. B.: Is There a Trade-off between Supervision and Wages? An Empirical Test of Efficiency Wage TUDORY. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1994, s. 107-129. Go to original source...
  10. Salop, S., Salop, J.: Self-Selection and Turnover in the Labor Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976, s. 619-627. Go to original source...
  11. Schlicht, E.: Labour Turnover, Wage Structure, and Natural Unemployment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1978, s. 337-346.
  12. Shapiro, C., Stiglitz, J. E.: Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device. American Economic Review, 1984, s. 433-444.
  13. Stiglitz, J.: Alternative Theories of Wage Determination and Unemployment in LDCs: The Labor Turnover Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1974, s. 194-227. Go to original source...
  14. Stiglitz, J.: The Efficiency Wage Hypothesis, Surplus Labour, and the Distribution of Income in LDCs. Oxford Economic Papers, 1976, s. 185-207. Go to original source...
  15. Yellen, J. L.: Efficiency Wage Models of Unemployment. American Economic Review, 1984, s. 200-205.
  16. Weiss, A.: Efficiency Wages - Models of Unemployment, Layoffs, and Wage Dispersion. Princeton, Princeton University Press 1990. Go to original source...
  17. Weiss, A. M.: Job Queues and Layoffs in Labor Markets with Flexible Wages. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, s. 526-538. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.