Politická ekonomie 2006, 54(2):204-213 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.553

Efekty státní podpory podniků

Alena Zemplinerová
Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR, Praha.

Effects of state aid to enterprises

The aim of the article is to describe theoretical concepts related to the effects of state subsidies on enterprises and to discuss the magnitude and effect of state aid on enterprises during the transformation of the Czech economy. Subsidies to enterprises during transformation were high, often transparent, and above the European Union average. During 1997-2003 registered state aid reached 362 bn. CZK. More than 90 percent of the total registered state aid went to awards the rescue and restructuring of enterprises. It can be roughly estimated that during 1997-2000 state aid was twice as high as officially registered. Share of state aid to enterprises in public debt increased and reached 70 percent by 2003. Non-transparent channels of state aid distribution decrease the efficiency of state aid, as they distort market signals and decrease motivation for fair competition.

Keywords: market failure, competition, state aid, restructuring
JEL classification: F13, G38, H20

Published: April 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zemplinerová, A. (2006). Effects of state aid to enterprises. Politická ekonomie54(2), 204-213. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.553
Download citation

References

  1. Baldwin, R.E., Krugman, P.R.: Market Access and International Competition: A Stimulating Study of 16 K Random Access Memory, R.C. Freestra (ed.) Empirical Methods for International Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press 1987. Go to original source...
  2. BenáČEk, V.: Fiscal Convergence to the Countries of European Union and the State Burden, Prague Economic Papers, 1997, č. 4, s. 313-322. Go to original source...
  3. Besley, T., Seabright, P.: The effects and policy implications of State Aids to Industry: an economic ananlysis, Economic Policy, 1999, č. 14 (28). Go to original source...
  4. BEZDĚK, V., Dybczak, K., Krejdl, A.: Czech Fiscal Policy: Introductory Analysis, Working Paper Series of the Czech National Bank, 2003, č. 7.
  5. Bohatá, M.: Country Report on State Aid in the Czech Republic, mimeo, April 2004.
  6. Brander, J., Spencer, B.: Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry, Journal of International Economics, 1985, č. 18, s. 83-100. Go to original source...
  7. Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G.: Towards a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society, College Station, Texas, Texas A & M University Press 1980.
  8. Collie, D.: State Aid in the European Union: the prohibition of subsidies in an integrated market, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 2000, č. 18, s. 867-884. Go to original source...
  9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC): State Aid Scoreboard, Autumn 2002 Update, Special Edition on Candidate Countries, COM (2002), 638 final, Brussels, 2002.
  10. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer, A.: The Regulation of Entry, Quart. J. Econ., 2002, 117: 1, s. 1-37. Go to original source...
  11. Hayek, F.A.: The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review, 1945, č. 4, s. 519-30.
  12. Hazemann, R.D., Jones, B.R., Montador, R.B.: Tax Reform in OECD Countries: Motives, Constraints and Practice, OECD Economic Studies, 1988, č. 10, s. 185-286.
  13. Khan, A.: The Economics of Regulation, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 1988.
  14. Klepper, G.: Entry into the Market for Large Transport Aircraft, Institute für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, Universitaet Kiel, Working paper, May 1989, č. 375.
  15. Kruger, A.: The Political Economy of the Rent Seeking Society, American Economic Review, 1974, č. 64, s. 291-303.
  16. Krugman, P.: Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1991.
  17. Leahy, D., Neary, P.: International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy without Government Commitment, Review of International Economics, 1996, č. 4, s. 322-338. Go to original source...
  18. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H.: Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified? Economic Policy, October, 2002, č. 35. Go to original source...
  19. Mládek, J., Hashi, I.: Barriers to entry in the Czech Republic. In: Hashi I et al., Barriers to entry and Growth of new firms in early transition, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003. Go to original source...
  20. Mollgaard, P.: Competitive effects of state aid in oligopoly, mimeo, Dpt. Of Economics and Centre for Law, Kopenhagen, Kopenhagen Business School, December 2003.
  21. Neven, D., Seabright, P.: European Industrial Policy: The Airbus Case, Economic Policy, 1995, č. 21, s. 313-358. Go to original source...
  22. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press 1965.
  23. Pelzman, S.: Towards a General Theory of Regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, 1976, č. 19 (2), s. 211-248. Go to original source...
  24. Pigou, A.: The Economics of Welfare, London, Macmillan and Co. 1938.
  25. Poláčková-Brixi, H.: Fiskální rizika nejsou jen v rozpočtu, Finance a úvěr, 2000, č. 3, s. 147-159.
  26. Schwartz, G., Clements, B.: Government subsidies, Journal of Economic Surveys, 1999, č. 2, s. 119-147. Go to original source...
  27. Stigler, G.: The Theory of Economic Regulation, Bell Journal of Economics, 1971, č. 2, s. 3-21. Go to original source...
  28. Tullock, G.: The Politics of Bureaucracy, Washington D.C., Public Affairs Press 1965.
  29. Winston, C.: Economic Deregulation: Days of Reckoning for Microeconomists, Journal of Economic Literature, 1993, č. 31 (3), s. 1263-1289.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.