Politická ekonomie 2006, 54(3):291-306 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.559

Polemika se Svetozarem Pejovichem o transformační, tedy neklasické privatizaci

Václav Klaus, Dušan Tříska
V době vzniku tzv. Scénáře ekonomické reformy působili autoři na československém ministerstvu financí jako ministr, resp. náměstek ministra. V současnosti je Václav Klaus prezidentem České republiky, Dušan Tříska soukromě podniká v oboru informačních technologií. Oba vyučují na VŠE.

A polemic with svetozar pejovich on the transformational, i.e. non-classical privatization

The authors critically discuss some of the theses of Svetozar Pejovich from his article On the Privatization of "Stolen Goods" in Central and Eastern Europe. The Independent Review, v. X, N. 2, Fall 2005, s. 209-229. ISSN 1086- 653. Their polemic can be summarized as follows: (1) According to Pejovich, the "carriers of the institutional restructuring" relied solely on the neo-classical ("text-book") economics. The authors reply that at least in their country also the New Institutional School, Austrian Economics and Public Choice were well known and broadly applied. (2) Pejovich seems to confuse privatization of an individual enterprise with the privatization of the society as a whole, i.e. the actual task of the governments. While the former may seek for an optimal owner, the latter is assigned "only" to launch the initial market for ownership rights. (3) Pejovich seems to believe that governments could have controlled the exact sequencing of their transformation steps and measures. By contrast, the authors stress the extreme spontaneity of the real-life developments and absurdity of the attempts to postpone, e.g., privatization - freeze it till some optimal legal frame emerges and-or is installed. (4) As to the Pejovich's de-communisation, the authors speculate that he may have generalized the Yugoslav experience, where the communists could have shared their Party's titoistic ideology. Contrariwise, the membership of a typical Czech communist was never based on the ideology and thus represented nothing about his/her post-communist concepts. (5) As to the Pejovich's own proposal "how to do it", the authors stress, again, its unrealistic nature, as what the proposal requires in fact is nothing less than to (a) accurately valuate thousands of state-owned enterprises, (b) rationally restructure them physically and financially, (c) offer and sell them at a correct price and (d) fairly divide the proceeds among its citizens. To the authors of this polemic, a task of this magnitude is beyond capacity of anybody, not to mention governments, least of all the post-communist ones.

Keywords: privatization, property rights, transformation, communism, institutional restructuring, main-stream economics, public-choice
JEL classification: P2, P20, P26, P31

Published: June 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Klaus, V., & Tříska, D. (2006). A polemic with svetozar pejovich on the transformational, i.e. non-classical privatization. Politická ekonomie54(3), 291-306. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.559
Download citation

References

  1. Bokros, L.: Rozdílné cesty visegrádských dvojČAt k relativní prosperitě. Finance a úvěr, 2001, č. 4.
  2. Copeland, T. a kol.: Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. New York, John Wiley and Sons 1990..
  3. Frydman, R., Rapaczynski, A., Earle, J.S.: The Privatization process in Central Europe. New York, Central European University 1993. Go to original source...
  4. Klaus, V.: Budeme podniky privatizovat, anebo sanovat? In Nemám rád katastrofické scénáře. Praha, Sagit 1991.
  5. Klaus, V. (1993a), Privatization Experience: The Czech Case. Přednáška pro International Chamber of Commerce Meeting, Cancún, Mexico, 21. října 1993.
  6. Klaus, V. (1993b), The Ten Commandments of Systemic Reform, The Group of Thirty, Vienna, April 1993. Republished in The Rebirth of Liberty in the Heart of Europe. Washington D.C., CATO Institute 1997.
  7. Klaus, V. Transformation Rules: The Hypothesis of Two Cushions. In Dismantling Socialism: An Interim Report. Praha 1994.
  8. Klaus, V. (1997a), Systemic change: The Delicate Mixture of Intentions and Spontaneity. In The Rebirth of Liberty in the Heart of Europe. Washington D.C., CATO Institute 1997.
  9. Klaus, V. (1997b), The Rebirth of Liberty in the Heart of Europe. Washington D.C., CATO Institute 1997.
  10. Klaus, V. (1997c), A Short or Long Way to Privatization: The Czech Experience. In Leube, K.R., Petroni, A.M., Sadowsky, J.S., ed., An Austrian in France. Torino, La Rosa 1997.
  11. Klaus, V. Země, kde se již dva roky nevládne. Praha, CEP 1999.
  12. Klaus, V. (2002a), K desátému výročí kupónové privatizace. In Kupónová privatizace. Ekonomika, právo a politika. Praha, CEP 2002, č. 13.
  13. Klaus, V. (2002b), Nobelova cena, Prof. Stiglitz a jeho soudy o České ekonomice. Lidové noviny, 3. ledna 2002.
  14. Klaus, V. Dynamika postkomunistické transformace a její alternativní výklady. In Rok první. Praha, Knižní klub 2004.
  15. Klaus, V. What Lessons Can Be Learned from Privatization in a Post-Communist Country: The Czech Experience. World Economic Development Congress, Washington D.C., September 1998. In On the Road to Democracy. Dallas, Texas, National Center for Policy Analysis 2005.
  16. Klaus, V. Před patnácti lety se u nás zaČAl rodit kapitalismus. Mladá fronta Dnes, 11. ledna 2006.
  17. Klaus, V., Tříska, D. (1987a), James McGill Buchanan - Nobelova cena za ekonomii 1986. Ekonomicko-matematický obzor, 1987, č. 2.
  18. Klaus, V., Tříska, D. (1987b), Ekonomie Nicholase Kaldora - nová ekonomie, nebo jiné ambice? Politická ekonomie, 1987, č. 9.
  19. Klaus, V., Tříska, D. Recenzní zamyšlení nad knihou Jánose Kornaie "Socialistický systém: Politická ekonomie komunismu". Finance a úvěr, 1995, č. 3.
  20. Kočenda, E.: Transformace a konvergence ve střední a východní Evropě. Finance a úvěr, 2001, č. 4.
  21. Mládek, J.: Voucher Privatisation in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Mass Privatization: An Initial Assessment. Paris, Centre for Co-operation with the Economies in Transition OECD 1995.
  22. Mládek, J.: Kupónová privatizace - politický úspěch, ekonomické selhání. In Kupónová privatizace. Ekonomika, právo a politika. Praha, CEP 2002, č. 13.
  23. Simoneti, M., Tříska, D., ed.: Investment Funds as Intermediaries of Privatization. Ljubljana, CEEPN 1994.
  24. Sojka, M.: Asymetrické informace a jejich důsledky pro metodologii ekonomie. In Ekonomika, právo a politika. Praha, CEP 2002, č. 19.
  25. Stiglitz, J. E.: Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition. Keynote Address Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, D.C., April 1999.
  26. Tříska, D. (1991a), Political, Organizational, and Legislative Aspects of Mass Privatization, Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe. Ljubljana, CEEPN 1991.
  27. Tříska, D. (1991b), O vítězích a poražených, Sobotní telegraf, 13. června 1991.
  28. Tříska, D. Privatization and Corporate Governance in Eastern Europe: Comment. In Central and Eastern Europe Roads to Growth. Seminar in Baden, Austria, April 15-18, 1991, International Monetary Fund, Washington 1992
  29. Tříska, D. Postprivatizační restrukturalizace vlastnictví. In Dnešní fáze restrukturalizace vlastnických vztahů v ČR - úspěchy a problémy. Česká společnost ekonomická, září 1994.
  30. Tříska, D. Post-privatization Securities Markets. In Mass Privatization: An Initial Assessment. Paris, Centre for Co-operation with the Economies in Transition OECD 1995.
  31. Tříska, D. Post-privatization ownership structure and competition. The Mont Pelerin Society Meeting, Vienna, September 1996.
  32. Tříska, D. (2002a), Východiska, cíle a principy provedení kupónové privatizace. In Kupónová privatizace. Ekonomika, právo a politika. Praha, CEP 2002, č. 13.
  33. Tříska, D. (2002b), Nedokonalosti trhu a jejich řešení. In Ekonomika, právo a politika. Praha, CEP 2002, č. 19.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.