Politická ekonomie 2007, 55(5):659-680 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.618

Ekonomie náboženství - je hypotéza sekularizace opodstatněná?

Marek Loužek
Filozofická fakulta UK; Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

Economics of religion - is the secularization hypothesis tenable?

The article is concerned with the economics of religion. The first chapter is introduction into the economics of religion by Adam Smith. The second chapter asks the question whether the secularization hypothesis is tenable. The third chapter analyzes the allocation of time and church attendance and investments into religious capital. The forth chapter examines religious market in perfect or imperfect competition. The fifth chapter summarizes empirical research. The sixth chapter brings conclusions.

Keywords: economics of religion, secularization hypothesis, religious pluralism, state religion, religious market, allocation of time
JEL classification: D1, J2, Z1

Published: October 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Loužek, M. (2007). Economics of religion - is the secularization hypothesis tenable? Politická ekonomie55(5), 659-680. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.618
Download citation

References

  1. ALLEN, D. W. 1995. Order in the Church. A Property Rights Approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1995, vol. 27, no. 1, s. 97-117. Go to original source...
  2. ANDERSON, G. M. 1988. Mr. Smith and the Preachers. The Economics of Religion in the Wealth of Nations. Journal of Political Economy. 1988, vol. 96, no. 5, s. 1066-1088. Go to original source...
  3. AZZI, C.; EHRENBERG, R. 1975. Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance. Journal of Political Economy. 1975, vol. 83, no. 1, s. 27-56. Go to original source...
  4. BAINBRIDGE, W. S.; STARK, R. 1987. A Theory of Religion. New York : P. Lang, 1987.
  5. BARRO, J. B.; McCLEARY, R. M. 2003. International Determinants of Religiosity [Working Paper 10147]. National Bureau for Economic Research, 2003. Go to original source...
  6. BARROS, P. P.; GAROUPA, N. An Economic Theory of Church Strictness. Economic Journal. 2002, vol. 112, no. 481, s. 559-570. Go to original source...
  7. BECKER, G. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA; London, GB : Harvard University Press, 1991. Go to original source...
  8. BECKER, G. 1997. Religions Thrive in a Free Market, Too. In BECKER, G. The Economics of Life. New York, San Francisco : McGraw-Hill, 1997, s. 15-17.
  9. BECKER, G. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago; London : University of Chicago Press, 1976.
  10. BEED, C.; BEED, C. 1996. A Christian perspective on economics. Journal of Economic Methodology. 1996, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 91-112. Go to original source...
  11. EKELUND, R. B.; HÉBERT, R. F.; TOLLISON, R. D. 2005. Adam Smith on Religion and Market Structure. History of Political Economy. 2005, vol. 37, no. 4, s. 647-660. Go to original source...
  12. EKELUND, R. B.; HEBERT, R. F.; TOLLISON, R. D. 1989. An economic model of the medieval church - usury as a form of rent seeking. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisations. 1989, vol. 5, no. 2, s. 307-331.
  13. EVAN, T. 2001. Ekonomické myšlení Jana Kalvína o lichvě a úroku. Politická ekonomie. 2001, vol. 49, no. 6, s. 853-868. Go to original source...
  14. EVENSKY, J. 1998. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. The Role of Religion and Its Relationship to Philosophy and Ethics in the Evolution of Society. History of Political Economy. 1998, vol. 30, no. 1, s. 17-43. Go to original source...
  15. FINKE, R.; STARK, R.; IANNACCONE, L. R. 1998. Rationality and "Religious Mind". Economic Inquiry. 1998, vol. 36, no. 3, s. 373-389. Go to original source...
  16. FINKE, R. 1990. Religious Deregulation - Origins and Consequences. Journal of Church and State. 1990, vol. 32, no. 3, s. 609-626. Go to original source...
  17. FINKE, R. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776-1990. Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, N. J. : Rutgers University Press, 1992.
  18. GLÄSER, E.; GLENDON, S. 1998. Incentives, Predestination and Free Will. Economic Inquiry. 1998, vol. 36, no. 3, 429-443. Go to original source...
  19. GOCKEL, G. 1969. Income and Religious Affiliation. A Regression Analysis. American Journal of Sociology. 1969, vol. 74, no. 6, s. 632-647. Go to original source...
  20. GREELEY, A. M.; Durkin, J. T. 1991. A Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty. Rationality and Society. 1991, vol. 3, no. 2, s. 178-196. Go to original source...
  21. GREELEY, A. M. 1989. Religious Change in America. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1989.
  22. GRUBER, J. H. 2005. Religious Market Structure, Religious Participation, and Outcomes. Is Religion Good for You? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy. 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, s. 1454-1454. Go to original source...
  23. GUSTAFSSON, G. 1990. Politicization of State Churches. A Welfare State Model. Social Compass. 1990, vol. 37, no. 1, s. 107-116. Go to original source...
  24. HAMBERG, E. M.; PETTERSON, T. 1994. The religious market - denominational competition and religious participation in contemporary Sweden. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1994, vol. 33, no. 3, s. 205-216. Go to original source...
  25. HOLMAN, R. aj. 2001. Dějiny ekonomického myšlení. Praha : C. H. Beck, 2001.
  26. HUME, D. 1993. The Natural History of Religion. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1993 [1757].
  27. CHAVES, M.; CANN, D. E. 1992. Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure. Rationality and Society. 1992, vol. 4, no. 3, s. 272-290. Go to original source...
  28. IANNACCONE, L. R. 1994. Progress in the economics of religion. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1994, vol. 150, no. 4, s. 737-744.
  29. IANNACCONE, L. R. 1990. Religious Participation. A Human Capital Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1990, vol. 29, no. 3, s. 297-314. Go to original source...
  30. IANNACCONE, L. R. 1992. Sacrifice and Stigma. Reducing Free-Riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives. Journal of Political Economy. 1992, vol. 100, no. 2, s. 271-291. Go to original source...
  31. IANNACCONE, L. R. 1991. The Consequences of Religious Market Structures. Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion. Rationality and Society. 1991, vol. 3, no. 2, s. 156-177. Go to original source...
  32. LAND, K. G.; DEANE, G. 1991. Religious Pluralism and Church Membership. A Spatial Diffusion Model. American Sociological Review. 1991, vol. 56, no. 2, s. 237-249. Go to original source...
  33. LEATHERS, Ch. G.; RAINES, J. P. 1999. Adam Smith and Thomas Chalmers on Financing Religious Instruction. History of Political Economy. 1999, vol. 31, no. 2, s. 337-359. Go to original source...
  34. LIPFORD, J. W.; TOLLISON, R. D. 2003. Religious Participation and Income. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2003, vol. 51, no. 2, s. 249-260. Go to original source...
  35. LOUŽEK, M. 2004. Církve potřebují konkurenci. In Vztah církví a státu [Sborník textů CEP č. 31]. Praha : CEP, 2004, s. 31-46.
  36. LUŽNÝ, D.; NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Z. Religion and Secularization in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review. 2001, vol. 9, no. 1, s. 85-98. Go to original source...
  37. MAO, W.; ZECH, Ch. 2002. Choices of Organizational Structures in Religious Organization. A Game Theoretic Approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2002, vol. 47, no. 1, s. 55-70. Go to original source...
  38. MARTIN, D. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1978.
  39. McCONNELL, M. W.; POSNER, R. A. 1989. An economic approach to issues of religious freedom. University of Chicago Law Review. 1989, vol. 56, no. 1, s. 1-60. Go to original source...
  40. NEŠPOR, Z. 2004. Dvojí tradice České sociologie náboženství. Sociologický ČAsopis / Czech Sociological Review. 2004, vol. 40, no. 4, s. 447-468. Go to original source...
  41. ORTMANN, A. 1999. Adam Smith on Joint-Stock Companies, Teachers, and Preachers. History of Political Economy. 1999, vol. 31, no. 2, s. 297-315. Go to original source...
  42. SACERDOTE, B.; GLÄSER, E. L. 2001. Education and Religion. [Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1913]. Harvard : Institute of Economic Research, 2001.
  43. SEDLÁČEK, T. 2001. Ekonomické myšlení Tomáše Akvinského. Politická ekonomie. 2001, vol. 49, no. 3, s. 437-448. Go to original source...
  44. SCHEINKMAN, J.; GLÄSER, E. 1998. Neither a Borrower Nor a Lender Be. An Economic Analysis of Interest Restrictions and Usury Laws. Journal of Law and Economics. 1998, vol. 41, no. 1, s. 1-36. Go to original source...
  45. SMITH, A. 2001. Náboženské instituce. In SMITH, A. Pojednání o podstatě a původu bohatství národů. Praha : Liberální institut, 2001 [1776], s. 698-723.
  46. SMITH, A. 2005. Teorie mravních citů. Praha : Liberální institut, 2005 [1759].
  47. SOJKA, M. aj. 1999. Dějiny ekonomických teorií. Praha : Karolinum, 1999.
  48. STARK, R.; IANNACCONE, L. R. 1994. A Supply-Side Reinterpretation of the "Secularization" of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1994, vol. 33, no. 3, s. 76-88. Go to original source...
  49. STIGLER, G.; BECKER, G. 1977. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review. 1977, vol. 67, no. 2, s. 76-90.
  50. TOLLISON, R. D.; EKELUND, R. B.; HÉBERT, R. F. 2002. An Economic Analysis of Protestant Reformation. Journal of Political Economy. 2002, vol. 110, no. 3, s. 646-671. Go to original source...
  51. VINER, J. 1978. Religious Thought and Economic Society. Durham, North Carolina : Duke University Press, 1978.
  52. WATERMAN, A. M. C.; BRENNAN, H. D. (eds). 1994. Economics and religion. Are they distinct? London : Kluwer Academic, 1994.
  53. WEBER, M. 1996. Die Protestantische Ethik und der "Geist" des Kapitalismus. Weinheim : Belth, Athenäum Verlag, 1996.
  54. ZALESKI, P.; ZECH, Ch. 1995. The optimal size of a religious congregation. An economic theory of clubs analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1995, vol. 54, no. 4, s. 439-451. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.