Politická ekonomie 2008, 56(1):54-66 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.630

Školné či dotace? (simulace s modely systému vysokých škol)

Tomáš Cahlík, Jiří Hlaváček, Jana Marková
Univerzita Karlova v Praze.

Tuitions or subsidies? (simulations with models of the university system)

The impact of different financing alternatives on two simple models of the university system is analysed in this paper. Both models are agent - based, the reason is that we analyse a system of heterogeneous universities instead of a representative university. Models differ in the rules for the decision-making of universities. In the first - optimising model - each university in each period maximalizes the probability of survival, control variables are the income of universities and the salary of teachers. In the second model we implicitly assume constrained rationality or shortage of relevant information and each university in each period reacts according to simple rules on the difference between the number of applicants and its capacity. Basic result is that the behaviour of models in different situations differs with the financing alternatives and it would be an oversimplification to generalize that some of the financing alternative is always the best.

Keywords: agent-based approach, financing in the educational sector, maximalization of survival probability, procedural rationality
JEL classification: C61, D00, H52, I21

Published: February 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cahlík, T., Hlaváček, J., & Marková, J. (2008). Tuitions or subsidies? (simulations with models of the university system). Politická ekonomie56(1), 54-66. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.630
Download citation

References

  1. BARR, N.; CRAWFORD, I. 2005. Financing Higher Education: Answers from the U.K. London and New York : Routledge, 2005. Go to original source...
  2. CAHLÍK, T.; MARKOVÁ, J. 2005. Systém vysokých škol s procedurální racionalitou agentů. [Working Paper UK FSV-IES 95, online]. Praha : Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, 2005. Dostupné z WWW: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/publication/684_wp_95_cahlik.pdf.
  3. FRANK, R. H. 1995. Mikroekonomie a chování. Praha : Svoboda, 1995.
  4. HLAVÁČEK, J. 2000. Zobecněné mikroekonomické kriterium. Politická ekonomie. 2000, roč. 48, č. 4, s. 515-529. Go to original source...
  5. HLAVÁČEK, J. 2005. Nabídková funkce ve vysokoškolském vzdělávání. [Working paper UK FSV-IES 90, online]. Praha : Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, 2005. Dostupné z WWW: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/publication/679_wp_90_hlavacek.pdf.
  6. METCALFE, J. S.; FOSTER, J. 2004. Evolution and Economic Complexity. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2004. Go to original source...
  7. SEGETHOVÁ, J.; VESELÝ, A.; KALOUS, J. 2002. Česká republika na cestě ke společnosti vědění. In KONČELÍK, J.; KÖPPLOVÁ, B.; PRÁZOVÁ, I. (eds.). Konsolidace vládnutí a podnikání v České republice a v Evropské unii. 3. vyd. Praha : Matfyzpress, 2002, s. 169-182.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.