Politická ekonomie 2008, 56(6):759-771 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.662

Modelování krachů na kapitálových trzích: aplikace teorie stochastických katastrof

Miloslav Voąvrda, Jozef Baruník
Ústav teorie informace a automatizace, AV ČR; Institut ekonomických studií, FSV UK, Praha.

Stock market crashes modeling: stochastic cusp catastrophe application

We show that the cusp catastrophe model explains the crash of stock exchanges much better than other models. On the data of U.S. stock markets we demonstrate that the crash of 1987 may be better explained by cusp catastrophe theory, which is not true for the crash of 2001. With the help of sentiment measures, such as index put/call options ratio and volume (the former models the proportion of the chartists, while the latter the fundamentalists), we have found that the 1987 returns are clearly bimodal and contain bifurcation flags. The cusp catastrophe model fits these data better then alternative models. Therefore we may say that the crash may have been led by internal forces. However, the causes for the crash of Sept. 11, 2001 are external, which is also evident in much weaker presence of bifurcations in the data. Thus alterantive models may be used for its explanation.

Keywords: nonlinear dynamics, cusp catastrophe, bifurcations, singularity, stock market crash
JEL classification: C01, C53

Published: December 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Voąvrda, M., & Baruník, J. (2008). Stock market crashes modeling: stochastic cusp catastrophe application. Politická ekonomie56(6), 759-771. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.662
Download citation

References

  1. COBB, L.; ZACKS, S. 1985. Applications of Catastrophe Theory for Statistical Modeling in the Biosciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1985, vol. 80, no. 392, s. 793-802. Go to original source...
  2. COBB, L. 1981. Parameter estimation for the cusp catastrophe model. Behavioral Science. 1981, no. 26, s. 75-78. Go to original source...
  3. COBB, L.; WATSON, B. 1980. Statistical catastrophe theory: an overview. Math. Model. 1980, no. 1, s. 311-317. Go to original source...
  4. COBB, L. 1992. Cusp Surface Analysis: User's guide. Unpublished manuscript.
  5. GUASTELLO, S. J. 1984. Cusp and butterfly catastrophe modeling of two opponent process models: Drug addiction and work performance. Behavioral Science. 1984, no. 29, s. 258-269. Go to original source...
  6. HARTELMAN; PASCAL A. I. 1997. Stochastic Catastrophe Theory. [Dissertatie reeks]. 1997. No.2. Faculteit Psychologie, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  7. OLIVA, T. A.; DESARBO, W. S.; DAY, D. L.; JEDIDI, K. 1987. GEMCAT: A general multivariate methodology for estimating catastrophe models. Behavioral Science. 1987, no. 32, s.121-137. Go to original source...
  8. ROSSER Jr., J. B. 2007. The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: Was the baby thrown out with the bathwater? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Elsevier. October 2007, vol. 31, no. 10, s. 3255-3280. Go to original source...
  9. SILVERMAN, B.W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida).
  10. SUSSMAN, H. J.; ZAHLER, R. 1978a. Catastrophe Theory as Applied to the Social and Biological Sciences. Synthése. 1987, vol. 37, no 2, s. 117-216. Go to original source...
  11. SUSSMAN, H. J.; ZAHLER, R. 1978b. A Critique of Applied Catastrophe Theory in Applied Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral Science. 1987, no. 23, s. 383-389. Go to original source...
  12. THOM, R. 1975. Structural Stability and Morpohogenesis. New York : Benjamin, 1975.
  13. WAGENMAKERS, E.J.; MOLENAAR, P.C.M.; HARTELMAN, P.A.I.; van der MAAS, H. L. J. 2005. Transformation invariant stochastic catastrophe theory. Physica D. 2005, s. 211263 Go to original source...
  14. ZAHLER, R.; SUSSMAN, H. J. 1977. Claims and Accomplishments of Applied Catastrophe Theory. Nature. 1977, 269:10, s. 759-763. Go to original source...
  15. ZEEMAN, E. C. 1974. On the unstable behaviour of stock exchanges. Journal of Mathematical Economics. Elsevier. March 1977, vol. 1, no. 1, s. 39-49. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.