Politická ekonomie 2009, 57(5):579-600 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.699

Monopoly centrálních bank a emise peněz

Zbyněk Revenda
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

Central Bank Monopolies and Money Issuance

The article deals with the role of the central banks in advanced market economies and the theoretical possibility of abolishing these institutions. Central banks have monopolies in some areas, especially regarding monetary policy. In many countries, central banks also have monopolies in other areas, for example in the payment and clearing transactions for banks and the state. In the context of the financial crises, there have been calls for the abolition of central banks and the restoration of money fully-backed by gold and issued by different subjects. The main reasoning behind these requests is connected with the accusation that central banks have been the basic culprits in the current crisis, because of their monopoly of the issuing money. This argument fails to recognize that central banks do not have a monopoly in issuing money as the dominant share of the money creation is attached with the process of multiplication of demand deposits by commercial banks. Restoration of the money backed by gold is furthermore completely unrealistic. The article discusses the shortage of gold stock as one of many reasons why gold is not suitable for monetary purposes.

Keywords: monetary policy, central bank, monopoly, banking regulation and supervision, gold, multiplication, money issuance
JEL classification: E42, E5, G2

Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Revenda, Z. (2009). Central Bank Monopolies and Money Issuance. Politická ekonomie57(5), 579-600. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.699
Download citation

References

  1. BRŮNA, K. 2007. Úrokový transmisní mechanismus a řízení úrokové marže bank v kontextu dezinflační politiky České národní banky. Politická ekonomie. 2007, roč. 55, č. 6, s. 829-851. Go to original source...
  2. CAVALCANTI, R. de O.; WALLACE, N. 1999. Inside and Outside Money as Alternative Media of Exchange. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, Part 2, s. 443-457. Go to original source...
  3. CECCHETTI, S. G.; KRAUSE, S. 2002. Central Bank Structure, Policy Efficiency, and Macroeconomic Performance: Exploring Empirical Relationships. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, July/ August 2002, vol. 84, no. 4, s. 47-59. Go to original source...
  4. CIMBUREK, J.; ŘEŽÁBEK, P. 2008. Hotovost v oběhu: světové trendy a situace v České republice. Politická ekonomie. 2008, roč. 56, č. 6, s. 739-758. Go to original source...
  5. DOWD, K. 1998. Private Money. Institute of Economic Affairs, Hobart Paper 112, 1988.
  6. DURČÁKOVÁ, J. 2009. Systémy měnových kurzů, jejich volba v tranzitivních ekonomikách a dopady na inflaci a ekonomický růst. Politická ekonomie. 2009, roč. 57, č. 3, s. 344-360. Go to original source...
  7. FISCHER, S. 1999. IMF as lender of last resort. Central Banking. February 1999, vol. 10, no. 3.
  8. GAVIN, W. T. 2009. More Money: Understanding Recent Changes in the Monetary Base. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, March/April 2009, vol. 91, no. 2, s. 49-59. Go to original source...
  9. GREEN, E. J. 2003. Economic perspective on the political history of the Second Bank of the United States. Economic Perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, First Quarter 2003, s. 59-67.
  10. HAYEK, F. A. von 1990. Denationalisation of Money. Institute of Economic Affairs, Hobart Paper Special 70, 1990.
  11. HÜLSMANN, J. G. 2003. Has Fractional-Reserve Banking Really Passed the Market Test? The Independent Review. Winter 2003, vol. 7, no. 3, s. 399-422.
  12. LAURENT, R. D. 1994. Is there a role for gold in monetary policy? Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, March/April 1994, vol. 18, issue 2, s. 2-14.
  13. MUSÍLEK, P. 2006. Komparace modelů finanční regulace a dozoru: výhody a nevýhody. Český finanční a úČEtní ČAsopis, no. 4/2006, s. 8-22. Go to original source...
  14. PATINKIN, D. 1965. Money, Interest and Prices. 2. vydání, London : Harper and Row, 1965.
  15. PETŘIVALSKÝ, J. 1984. Peněžní oběh a úvěr. Praha : SNTL/ALFA, 1984.
  16. REVENDA, Z. 2001. Centrální bankovnictví. 2. vydání, Praha : Management Press, 2001.
  17. RYSKA, P. 2008. Monopol, který státu kupodivu nevadí: centrální banka. Mladá fronta Dnes, 13. 9. 2008.
  18. RÖPKE, W. 1994. Ekonomika svobodné společnosti. Grove City, PA : Libertarian Press, 1994.
  19. SCHULTZ, A. 2005. The changing Role of the Federal Reserve. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2005, vol. 87, no. 2, s. 343-348. Go to original source...
  20. SCHWARTZ, A. J. 2005. Aftermath of the Monetarist Clash with the Federal Reserve Before and During the Volcker Era. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2005, vol. 87, no. 2, s. 349-351. Go to original source...
  21. ŠÍMA, J. 2002. Deflace - definiční znak zdravé ekonomiky. Finance a úvěr. 2002, roč. 52, č. 10, s. 539-549.
  22. VELDE, F. R. 2001. Following the yellow brick road: How the United States adopted the gold standard. Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Second Quarter 2002, vol. 26, issue 2, s. 42-58.
  23. WHITE, L. H.1999: The Theory of Monetary Institutions. Blackwell 1999.
  24. www.bloomberg.com
  25. www.cnb.cz
  26. www.ecb.int
  27. www.federalreserve.gov

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.