Politická ekonomie 2009, 57(5):660-676 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.703

Ekonomie životního prostředí na rozcestí

Jiřina Jílková1, Lenka Slavíková2
1 IEEP, Institut pro ekonomickou a ekologickou politiku při Národohospodářské fakultě, a Katedra ekonomiky životního prostředí Národohospodářské fakulty VŠE v Praze.
2 IEEP, Institut pro ekonomickou a ekologickou politiku při Národohospodářské fakultě, a Katedra institucionální ekonomie Národohospodářské fakulty VŠE v Praze.

Economics of the Environmental Protection on the Crossroad

Neoclassical environmental economics, ecological economics and free market approaches to environmental protection are currently three main schools of thoughts that are systematically focused on interactions between the society and the environment. They all have strong defenders as well as opponents. Although the environmental economics is still considered as mainstream, the critique from alternative approaches is increasing. The goal of the article is to briefly introduce main thoughts of all three schools and their interactions. The intensity of mutual interactions in the last decade was investigated via the analysis of articles published in high-rated journals.

Keywords: institutions, environmental economics, ecological economics, free market environmentalism, Austrian environmental economics
JEL classification: B13, Q57, Q59

Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jílková, J., & Slavíková, L. (2009). Economics of the Environmental Protection on the Crossroad. Politická ekonomie57(5), 660-676. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.703
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSON, T. L.; LEAL, D. R. 2001. Free Market Environmentalism (revisited edition). 1. vyd. New York : Palgrave, 2001. ISBN: 0-312235-03-8.
  2. AYRES, R. U.; KNEESE, A. V. 1969. Production, consumption and externalities. In Oates (ed.) The Economics of the Environment, 1. vyd. Cambridge : Edward Elgar, 1994, s. 4-18. ISBN: 1-85898-002-X.
  3. AZQUETA, D.; DELACÁMARA, G. 2006. Ethics, Economics and Environmental Management. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 56, no. 4, s. 524-533. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  4. BATES, R. a kol. 1998. Analytic Narratives, 1. vyd. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. ISBN: 0691001294.
  5. BAUMOL, W. J.; OATES, W. E. 1971. The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment. Swed. Journal of Economics. In Oates (ed.) The Economics of the Environment, 1. vyd. Cambridge : Edward Elgar, 1994, s. 161-173. ISBN: 1-85898-002-X.
  6. BECKER, CH. a kol. 2005. Malthus vs. Wordsworth: Perspectives on humankind, nature and economy. A contribution to the history and the foundations of ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 53, no. 3, s. 299-310. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  7. BLOCK, W. E. 2007. Environmentální problémy a jejich řešení pomocí vlastnických práv. In Čamrová, L. (ed.) Ekonomie a životní prostředí - nepřátelé či spojenci? 1. vyd. Praha : Alfa Publishing, 2007, s. 283-328. ISBN: 978-80-86851-69-3.
  8. BLOCK, W. E. 2005. Ethics, Efficiency, Coasian Property Rights, and Psychis Income: A Reply to Demsetz. The Review of Austrian Economics. 1995, vol. 8, no. 2, s. 61-125. ISSN: 0889-3047. Go to original source...
  9. BLOCK, W. E. 1977. Coase and Demsetz on Private Property Rights. Journal of Libertarian Studies. 1977, vol. 1, no. 2, s. 111-115. ISSN 0363-2873.
  10. BRÄTLAND, J. 2008. Resource Exhaustibility - A Myth Refuted by Entrepreneurial Capital Maintenance. The Independent Review. 2008, vol. 12, no. 3, s. 375-399. ISSN: 1086-1653.
  11. BROMLEY, D. W. 2007. Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: Moving beyond "market failure". Ecological Economics. 2007, vol. 63, no. 4, s. 676-683. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  12. BROMLEY, D. W. 2004. Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volational Pragmatism. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2004, vol. 32, no. 1, s. 73-99. ISSN 0924-6460. Go to original source...
  13. BROMLEY, D., W. 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1992, vol. 74, no. 3, s. 836-837. ISSN 0002-9092. Go to original source...
  14. BROWNSTEIN, B. P. 1980. Pareto Optimality, External Benefits and Public Goods: A Subjectivist Approach. The Journal of Libertarian Studies. 1980, vol. IV, no. 1, s. 93-106. ISSN 0363-2873.
  15. BUCHANAN, J. M. 1969. Cost and Choice: an Inquiry in Economic Theory. 1. vyd. Chicago : Markam Publishing Co., 1969. ISBN: 0-86597-223-0.
  16. COASE, R. 1960. The Problem of Social Costs. Journal of Law and Economics. 1960, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 1-44. ISSN: 0929-1261. Go to original source...
  17. CORDATO, R. 2004. An Austrian Theory of Environmental Economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2004, vol. 7, no. 1, s. 3-16. ISSN 1936-4806. Go to original source...
  18. DEMSETZ, H. 1979. Ethics and Efficiency in Property Rights Systems. In Rizzo (ed.) Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium: Explorations of Austrian Themes. 1. vyd. Lexington, Mass. : D. C. Heath, 1979. ISBN: 0-669-02698-0.
  19. ERIKSSON, R. 2005. On the ethics of environmental economics as seen from textbooks. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 52, no. 4, s. 421-435. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  20. FABER, M. a kol. 2002. Homo oeconomicus and homo politicus in Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 2002, vol. 40, no. 3, s. 232-333. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  21. FARROW, S. 1998. Environmental equity and sustainability: rejecting the Kaldor-Hicks criteria. Ecological Economics. 1998, vol. 27, no. 2, s. 183-188. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  22. FURUBOTN, E. G.; RICHTER, R. 2005. Institutions and Economic Theory. 2. vyd. Michigan : University of Michigan Press, 2005. ISBN: 0-472-03025-6.
  23. GOWDY, J. 2005. Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 53, no. 2, s. 211-222. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  24. GOWDY, J.; ERICKSON, J. 2005. Ecological economics at a crossroads. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 53, no. 2, s. 17-20. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  25. HOLMAN, R. a kol. 1999. Dějiny ekonomického myšlení. 1. vyd. Praha : C. H. Beck, 1999. ISBN: 807179-238-1.
  26. HOPPE, H. 2004. The Ethics and Economics of Private Property. In Colombato, E. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to The Economics of Property Rights. 1. vyd. Londýn : Edward Elgar, 2004. ISBN: 1-84064-994-1. Go to original source...
  27. HUFFMAN, J. L. 1994. The Inevitability of Private Rights in Public Lands. University of Colorado Law Review. 1994, no. 65, s. 241-277.
  28. CHI-ANG LIN, B. 2006. A Sustainable Perpective on the Knowledge Economy: A Critique of Austrian and Mainstream Views. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 60, s. 324-332. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  29. JENKINS, T. N. 1998. Economics and the Environment: A Case of Ethical Neglect. Ecological Economics. 1998, vol. 26, no. 2, s. 151-164. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  30. JOLLANDS, N. 2006. Concepts of efficiency in ecological economics: Sisyphus and the decision maker. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 56, no. 3, s. 359-372. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  31. KLAUS, V; TŘÍSKA, D. 2007. Ke kritice používání konceptu solidarity a diskriminace v intertemporální analýze tzv. globálních problémů. Politická ekonomie. 2007, roč. 55, č. 6, s. 723-750. ISSN: 00323233. Go to original source...
  32. KOLSTAD, Ch. D. 2000. Environmental Economics. 1. vyd. New York : Oxford University Press, 2000. ISBN: 0-19-511954-1.
  33. KOTÍKOVÁ, E. 2006. Ochrana životního prostředí v ekonomické teorii. Politická ekonomie. 2006, roč. 54, č. 2, s. 261-273. ISSN: 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  34. LIN, B. CH. 2006. A sustainable perspective on the knowledge economy: A critique of Austrian and mainstream views. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 60, no. 1, s. 324-332. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  35. LOUŽEK, M. 1999. Spor o metodu mezi rakouskou ekonomickou školou a německou historickou školou jako nejvýznamnější metodologický spor v dějinách ekonomie. Politická ekonomie, 1999, roč. 47, č. 4, s. 529-545. ISSN: 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  36. MA, CH.; STERN, D. I. 2006. Environmental and Ecological Economics: A Citation Analysis. Ecological Economics 58 (2006): 491-506. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  37. MISES, L. 2003. Epistemological Problems of Economics. 3. vyd. Auburn : Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2003. ISBN: 0-945466-36-6.
  38. MISES, L. 2006. Lidské jednání: pojednání o ekonomii. 1. vyd. Praha : Liberální institut, 2006. ISBN: 80-86389-45-6.
  39. NELSON, R. H. 1997. Does "Existence Value" Exist? Environmental Economics Encroaches on Religion. The Independent Review. 1997, vol. 1, no. 4, s. 499-521. ISSN: 1086-1653.
  40. OATES, W. E (ed.) 1992. The Economics of the Environment (Introduction). Elgar Critical Writtings Reader Series. 1. vyd. Londýn : Edward Elgar Publishing, 1992. ISBN: 1-85898-002-X.
  41. OSTROM, E. 1999. Revisiting the Commons. Local Lessons, Global Challenges. Science, vol. 284, 9. dubna 1999, s. 278-282. ISSN: 1870-4069. Go to original source...
  42. OSTROM, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. 1. vyd. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2005. ISBN: 0-691-12238-5.
  43. OSTROM, E. 2006. Governing the Commons - The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 18. vyd. New York : The Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN: 978-0-521-40599-7.
  44. PAAVOLA, J. 2006. Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 63, no. 1, s. 93-103. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  45. PAAVOLA, J.; ADGER, W. N. 2005. Institutional Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 53, no. 3, s. 353-368. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  46. PEARCE, D. W.; TURNER, R. K. 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. 1. vyd. Baltimore : The John Hopkins University Press, 1990. ISBN: 0-8018-3986-6.
  47. PENNINGTON, M. 2005. Liberty, Markets, and Environmental Values - A Hayekian Defense of FreeMarket Environmentalism. The Independent Review. 2005, vol. X, no. 1, s. 39-57. ISSN: 1086-1653.
  48. RAMOS-MARTIN, J. 2003. Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory. Ecological Economics. 2003, vol. 46, no. 3, s. 387-398. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  49. ROPKE, I. 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 55, no. 2, s. 262-290. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  50. ROPKE, I. 2004. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 2004, vol. 50, no. 3-4, s. 293-314. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  51. ROTHBARD, M. N. 2007. Právo, vlastnická práva a znečištění ovzduší. In Čamrová, L. (ed.) Ekonomie a životní prostředí - nepřátelé či spojenci? 1. vyd. Praha : Alfa Publishing, 2007, s. 241-282. ISBN: 978-80-86851-69-3.
  52. ROTHBARD, M. N. 1956. Toward Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics. Dostupný na http://www.mises.org/rothbard/toward.pdf.
  53. RUTH, M. 2006. A quest for the economics of sustainability and the sustainability of economics. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 56, no. 3, s. 332-342. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  54. ŘÍKOVSKÝ, M. 2004. Metodologie rakouské školy. Politická ekonomie. 2004, roč. 52, č. 5, s. 717-734. ISSN: 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  55. SAMUELSON, P. A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1954, vol. 36, no. 4, s. 387-389. ISSN: 0034-6535. Go to original source...
  56. SEN, A. 2002. Etika a ekonomie. 1. vyd: Praha : Vyšehrad, 2002. ISBN: 80-7021-549-6.
  57. SLAVÍK, J. 2007. Neoklasická ekonomie a ochrana životního prostředí. Politická ekonomie. 2007, roč. 55, č. 4, s. 526-538. ISSN: 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  58. SÖDERBAUM, P. 1999. Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 1999, vol. 28, no. 2, s. 161-170. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  59. SOUSA, T.; DOMINGOS, T. 2006. Is neoclassical microeconomics formally valid? An approach based on an analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics. Ecological Economics. 2006, vol. 58, no. 1, s. 160-169. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...
  60. STROUP, R. L. 2000. Free Riders and Collective Action Revisited. The Independent Review. 2000, vol. IV, no. 4, s. 485-500. ISSN: 1086-1653. Go to original source...
  61. STROUP, R. L.; GOODMAN, S. L. 1992. Property Rights, Environmental Resources and the Future. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 1992, no. 15, s. 427-441. ISSN: 01934872.
  62. SVOBODA, F. 2007. Za obzor neoklasické ekonomie: Cesta k principům nové institucionální ekonomie. Politická ekonomie. 2007, roč. 55, č. 4, s. 539-557. ISSN: 0032-3233. Go to original source...
  63. ŠÍMA, J. 2004. Ekonomie a právo. 1. vyd. Praha : Nakladatelství Oeconomica, 2004. ISBN: 80-245-0749-8.
  64. TIETENBERG, T. 1992: Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. 3. vyd. New York : HarperCollins Publishers, 1992. ISBN: 0-673-46328-1.
  65. TURNER, K. R.; PEARCE, D.; BATEMAN, I. 1994. Environmental Economics - An Elementary Introduction. 1. vyd. Londýn : Pearson Education, 1994. ISBN: 0-7450-1083-0.
  66. YANDLE, B. 2004. Environmental Turbiny Points, Institutions, and the Race to the Top. The Independent Review. 2004, vol. 9, no. 2, s. 211-226. ISSN: 1086-1653.
  67. YOUNG, O. R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change - Fit, Interplay and Scale. 1. vyd. Cambridge : The MIT Press, 2002. ISBN: 0-262-74024-9.
  68. VAN DEN BERGH, J. 2000. Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches, and Differences with Environmental Economics. TI 2000-080/3, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. Dostupný na http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/00080.pdf.
  69. VATN, A. 2005a. Institutions and the Environment. 1. vyd. Northampton : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005. ISBN: 1-84376-100-9.
  70. VATN, A. 2005b. Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecological Economics. 2005, vol. 55, no. 2, s. 203-217. ISSN: 0921-8009. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.