Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(2):147-165 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.724

Konkurenceschopnost obchodu ČR v procesu globalizace

Marek Rojíček
CES, Vysoká škola ekonomie a managementu.

Competitiveness of the Trade of the Czech Republic in the Process of Globalisation

Economic globalisation can be defined as growing interdependence of financial and goods and services markets in the international scale. The important part of globalisation form supranational corporations, which are reaction on the rising competitiveness and need for strategic alliances. The more open is the economy, the more important are the effects of globalisation on the goods and capital flows. This is the case of the Czech Republic, which is vitally dependent on the successful export performance. The export performance is relatively specialized concerning its product and territorial structure. In the period after EU accession the intensity of international cooperation grew rapidly in all the Central European countries, which is mostly the result of the huge FDI inflow at the beginning of the decade. Generally the process of globalisation has its positive and negative effects. For the Czech Republic the positive aspects of globalisation prevail due to its geographical location, qualified and cheap labour force and EU membership.

Keywords: competitiveness, transaction costs, fragmentation of value chain, high-tech products, globalisation, structure of trade
JEL classification: F11, F14, F43

Published: April 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rojíček, M. (2010). Competitiveness of the Trade of the Czech Republic in the Process of Globalisation. Politická ekonomie58(2), 147-165. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.724
Download citation

References

  1. ARNDT, S. W.; KIERZKOWSKI, H. (eds.) 2001. Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  2. BERGOEING, R.; KEHOE, T. J.; STRAUSS-KAHN, V.; YI, K. 2004. Why is Manufacturing Trade Rising Even as Manufacturing Output is Falling? American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 134-138. Go to original source...
  3. COASE, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 1937, vol. 4, p. 386-405. Go to original source...
  4. EC. 2005. EU Sectoral Competitiveness Indicators. Luxembourg: European Communities, 2005.
  5. EC. 2007. Trade and Catching Up in the EU. Brussels: European Commission, 2007.
  6. EUROSTAT. 2004. Statistics in Focus, 2004, č.10.
  7. DUNNING, J. H. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Workingham, AddisonWesley Publishing 1993.
  8. EGGER, H.; EGGER, P. 2001. International Outsourcing and the Productivity of Lowskilled Labour in the EU. [WIFO Working Paper, no. 152, 2001]
  9. FAGERBERG, J. 2000. Technological Progress, Structural Change and Productivity Growth: A Comparative Study. Oslo, University of Oslo 2000. Go to original source...
  10. FRANKEL, J. A.; ROMER, D. 1999. Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review, 1999, Vol. 89, No. 3. Go to original source...
  11. HÁJEK, M. 2008. Ekonomický růst v ČR a nových členských zemích Evropské unie v období 1995-2006. Politická ekonomie, 2008, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 435-448. Go to original source...
  12. HAVRYLYSHYN O.; KUNZEL, P. 1997. Intra-industy Trade of Arab Countries: an Indicator of Potential Competitiveness. [IMF Working Paper, no. 47] Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1997. Go to original source...
  13. HUMMELS, D. 1998. Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade. FRBNY Policy Review, June 1998, Vol. 4, pp. 79-98.
  14. JONES, R. W. 2000. Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade. Cambridge (MA): MIT Presss, 2000.
  15. KADEŘÁBKOVÁ, A. 2006. Česká republika v globalizované a znalostně založené ekonomice. [Working Paper CES VŠEM, no. 11/2006] Praha, 2006.
  16. KOZA, P., SIVICKI, G. (ed.) 2006. Poland. Competitiveness report 2006. The Role of Innovation. Warsaw School of Economics, World Economy Research Institute, 2006.
  17. LEAMER, E. 1995. The Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice. Princeton Studies in International Economics, Princeton, 1995.
  18. MATKOWSKI, Z., PRÓCHNIAK, M. 2007. Economic Convergence Between the CEE-8 and the European Union. Eastern European Economics, 2007, Vol. 45, pp. 59-76. Go to original source...
  19. OECD. 2005. Measuring Globalization: Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators. Paris: OECD 2005.
  20. OECD. 2008. Staying Competitive in the Global Economy. Compendium of Studies on Global Value Chains. Paris: OECD, 2008.
  21. PORTER, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, 1990. Go to original source...
  22. SPĚVÁČEK, V. a kol. 2008. Česká ekonomika po vstupu do EU. Politická ekonomie, 2008, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 291-317. Go to original source...
  23. SRHOLEC, M. 2007. High Tech Exports from Developing Countries: A Symptom of Technology Spurts or Statistical Illusion? Review of World Economics, 2007, Vol. 143, pp. 227-255. Go to original source...
  24. UNCTAD. 2006. Global Value Chains for Building National Productive Capacities. [TD/B/COM.3/79] UNCTAD, 2006.
  25. VINTROVÁ, R.: Česká a slovenská ekonomika 15 let po rozdělení. Politická ekonomie, 2008, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 449-466. Go to original source...
  26. YI, K. 2003. Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? Journal of Political Economy, 2003, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 52-102. Go to original source...
  27. ZAMRAZILOVÁ, E. 2007. Přímé zahraniční investice v české ekonomice: rizika duality a role trhu práce. Politická ekonomie, 2007, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 579-602. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.