Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(3):291-304 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.731

Hodnocení veřejných projektů z hlediska společenské míry diskontace

Jan Kubíček, Leoš Vítek
1 ČNB.
2 Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

Evaluation of Public Projects from the Viewpoint of Social Rate of Discount

A social rate of discount is an important variable for cost-benefit analysis. Its size can be crucial for an approval (or disapproval) of the project under evaluation, therefore it is important to have a theoretically founded estimate of the discount rate. There are two main approaches to estimating the social rate of discount. The first one is a so called social time preference rate (STPR), which is composed of three components: pure time preference, mortality rate and a component reflecting secular growth of per capita consumption and wealth. We agree with other authors that although pure time preference is not in reality zero for individuals due to myopia and irrationality, it should be equal to zero from the point of view of the public sector. We have also shown why it is inconsistent to use mortality rate directly as a component of the STPR and why a somewhat lower rate should be used instead. These two components together with an estimate of gradually decreasing growth of per capita consumption give a gradually decreasing STPR for the Czech Republic starting at 5.4 % and converging in 40 years' period to 2.8 % per year. The other approach to estimating the social discount rate is based on social opportunity costs (SOC). We used long-term bond yields for estimating a certainty equivalent social discount rate. We found gradually decreasing discount rate as appropriate, which starts at 3.2 % and declines by 0.016 percentage points per every year of duration of the project.

Keywords: cost-benefit analysis, social rate of discount, intergenerational solidarity, pure time preference, certainty equivalence, long-term bonds
JEL classification: D61, D63, H43

Published: June 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kubíček, J., & Vítek, L. (2010). Evaluation of Public Projects from the Viewpoint of Social Rate of Discount. Politická ekonomie58(3), 291-304. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.731
Download citation

References

  1. ANDRLE, M.; BRŮHA, J. 2004. Význam forem diskontování v ekonomickém modelování. Politická ekonomie. 2004, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 757-771. Go to original source...
  2. ARROW, J. K.; LIND C. R. 1970. Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions. American Economic Review. 1970, 60 (3), s. 364-378.
  3. ARROW, J. K. 2007. Global Climate Change: A Challenge to Policy. The Economists' Voice. 2007, roč. 4 (3), článek 2. Dosažitelné z http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol4/iss3/art2. Go to original source...
  4. ČESKÝ STATISTICKÝ ÚŘAD. 2004. Projekce obyvatelstva ČR do roku 2050, dostupné na http://www.czso.cz.
  5. DVOŘÁK, A.; BRŮHA, J.; BRŮHOVÁ-FOLTÝNOVÁ, H.; MELICHAR, J.; ŠČASNÝ, M. 2007. Kapitoly z ekonomie přírodních zdrojů a oceňování životního prostředí. Praha: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Oeconomica, 2007.
  6. EVANS, D. 2004. A social discount rate for France. Applied Economics Letters. 2004, No. 11, s. 803-808. Go to original source...
  7. EVANS, D. 2006. Social Discount Rates for the European Union. [Working Paper n. 2006-20]. Milano: Università degli Studi di Milano, 2006.
  8. EVANS, D.; SEZER, H. 2002. A Time Preference Measure of the Social Discount Rate for the UK. Applied Economics. 2002, No. 34, pp. 1925-1934. Go to original source...
  9. EVANS, D.; SEZER, H. 2004. Social Discount Rates for Six Major Countries. Applied Economics. 2004, No. 11, s. 557-560. Go to original source...
  10. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE. 2008. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Brusel: Evropská komise, 2008.
  11. FAMA, F. E. 1996. Discounting under uncertainty. Journal of Business. 1996, 69 (4), pp. 415-428. Go to original source...
  12. FREDERICK, S.; LOEWENSTEIN, G.; O´DONOGHUE, T. 2002. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002, 40 (2), pp. 351-401. Go to original source...
  13. GOLLIER, C. 2002. Discounting an Uncertain Future. Journal of Public Economics. 2002, Vol. 85, pp. 149-166. Go to original source...
  14. HM TREASURY. 2003. Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: HM Treasury, 2003.
  15. KLAUS, V.; TŘÍSKA, D. 2007. Ke kritice používání konceptu solidarity a diskriminace v intertemporální analýze tzv. globálních problémů. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 723-750. Go to original source...
  16. KULA, E. 1984. Derivation of Social Time Preference Rates for the United States and Canada. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1984, 99 (4), pp. 873-882. Go to original source...
  17. MEJZLÍK, L.; PELÁK, J.; IŠTVÁNFYOVÁ, J. 2008. Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards into the Czech Accounting Regulation. In KIERKEGAARD, S. M. (ed.), Business and Law: Theory and Practice. New York: IATL, 2008.
  18. NĚMEC, OCHRANA, F. 2004.; ŠUMPÍKOVÁ, M. 2008. Czech and Slovak Lessons for Public Administration Performance Evaluation, Management and Finance. Ekonomický časopis. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 353-369.
  19. OCHRANA, F. 2004. Hodnocení veřejných projektů a zakázek. 3. vyd. Praha: ASPI Publishing, 2004.
  20. PAVEL, J.; SIČÁKOVÁ-BEBLAVÁ, E. 2008. Transparentnost' trhu verejného obstarávania v Českej republike a v Slovenskej republike. Ekonomický časopis. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 168-181.
  21. PEARCE, D. W. 2006. Discounting, in Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Paříž: OECD Publishing, 2006.
  22. PEARCE, D. W.; Ulph, D. 1999. A Social Discounting Rate for the UK. In PEARCE, D. W. (ed.). Economics and Environment: Essays on Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999, s. 268-285.
  23. PERCOCO, M. 2007. A Social Discount Rate for Italy. Applied Economics Letters. 2007, 15/1, pp. 73-77. Go to original source...
  24. RADOVÁ, J.; DVOŘÁK, P.; MÁLEK, J. 2007. Finanční matematika pro každého, 6. aktual. vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2007.
  25. SPACKMAN, M. 2004. Time discounting and of the cost of capital in government. Fiscal Studies. 2004, 25 (4), pp. 467-518. Go to original source...
  26. SPACKMAN, M. 2006. Social Discount Rates of the EU: an overview [Working paper n. 2006-33]. Milano : Fifth Milan European Economy Workshop, October 2006.
  27. STERN, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cabinet Office - HM Treasury, Cambridge University Press, 2007. Go to original source...
  28. WEITZMAN, M. L. 1998. Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1998, Vol. 36, pp. 201-208. Go to original source...
  29. ZHUANG, J.; LIANG, Z.; LIN, T; DE GUZMAN, F. 2007. Theory and Practice in the Choice of Social Discount Rate for Cost -benefit Analysis: A Survey [Economic and Research Department Working Paper No. 94]. Manila : Asian Development Bank, 2007. Dosažitelné z http://www.adb.org/Documents/ERD/Working_Papers/WP094.pdf.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.