Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(3):305-325 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.732

Gravitační a fiskální modely státní podpory exportních úvěrů v České republice

Karel Janda, Eva Michalíková, Věra Potácelová
1 VŠE v Praze.
2 FSV UK Praha.

Gravity and Fiscal Models of Government Support of Export Credit in the Czech Republic

The article deals with the export credit promotion in the Czech Republic. The econometric analysis of the gravity model of Czech trade shows that the credit support provided by specialized government agency, Czech Export Bank, has a positive but statistically weak influence on export. The other determinants of the Czech export in our model are GDP, distance, gross fixed capital formation, and policy risk. The comparison of estimated tax revenues from the supported projects with government subsidies provided to the Czech Export Bank shows that export promotion does not create a financial burden for the government budget. The budgetary costs of export credit support are offset by the tax revenues generated by supported export.

Keywords: credit, export, Government Support
JEL classification: C23, F14, G28

Published: June 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janda, K., Michalíková, E., & Potácelová, V. (2010). Gravity and Fiscal Models of Government Support of Export Credit in the Czech Republic. Politická ekonomie58(3), 305-325. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.732
Download citation

References

  1. ARELLANO, M.; BOND, S. 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies. 1991, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277-297. Go to original source...
  2. ARELLANO, M.; BOVER, O. 1995: Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of errorcomponents models. Journal of Econometrics. 1995, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 29-51. Go to original source...
  3. BALTAGI, B. H. 1998. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd ed. Wiley.1998.
  4. BERGSTRAND, J. H. 1985. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomics Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1985, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 474-481. Go to original source...
  5. BEVAN, A. A.; ESTRIN, S. 2004. The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 775-787. Go to original source...
  6. BLUNDELL, R.; BOND, S. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics. 1998, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 115-143. Go to original source...
  7. BOLCHA, P. 2008. O výpočte fiškálneho dopadu investičnej podpory. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 257-274. Go to original source...
  8. BOND, S. R. 2002. Dynamic panel data models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. CeMMAP Working Paper number CWP09/02. Go to original source...
  9. BRUN, J. F.; CARRERE, C.; GUILLAUMONT, P.; DE MELO, J. 2005. Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model. World Bank Economic Review. 2005, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 99-120. Go to original source...
  10. BUN, M.; KLAASSEN, F. 2002. The Importance of Dynamics in Panel Gravity Models of Trade. Discussion Paper, University of Amsterdam. 2002, No. 18. Go to original source...
  11. BURGER, M. J.; VAN OORT, F. G.; LINDERS, G. 2009. On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-Inflated Estimation. ERIM Report Series.
  12. BUSSIÈRE, M.; FIDRMUC, J.; Schnatz, B. 2008. Enlargement and Trade Integration: Lessons from a Gravity Model. Review of Development Economics. 2008, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.562-576. Go to original source...
  13. ČEB. 1999. Výroční zpráva 1998. Praha: ČEB, 1999.
  14. ČEB. 2000. Výroční zpráva 1999. Praha: ČEB, 2000.
  15. ČEB. 2001. Výroční zpráva 2000. Praha: ČEB, 2001.
  16. ČEB. 2002. Výroční zpráva 2001. Praha: ČEB, 2002.
  17. ČEB. 2003. Výroční zpráva 2002. Praha: ČEB, 2003.
  18. ČEB. 2004. Výroční zpráva 2003. Praha: ČEB, 2004.
  19. ČEB. 2005. Výroční zpráva 2004. Praha: ČEB, 2005.
  20. ČEB. 2006. Výroční zpráva 2005. Praha: ČEB, 2006.
  21. ČEB. 2007. Výroční zpráva 2006. Praha: ČEB, 2007.
  22. ČEB. 2008. Výroční zpráva 2007. Praha: ČEB, 2008.
  23. ČEB. 2009. Výroční zpráva 2008. Praha: ČEB, 2009.
  24. ČEB. 2009. Informace k 30. červnu 2009. Praha: ČEB, 2009.
  25. ČECHURA, L. 2009. The impact of credit rationing on farmer's economic equilibrium. Agricultural Economics (Czech). 2009, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 541-549. Go to original source...
  26. ČECHURA, L. 2008. Theoretical-empirical analysis of the role of the SGAFF in financing of farmers' activities. Agricultural Economics (Czech). 2008, Vol. 54, No. 10, pp. 476-488. Go to original source...
  27. ČECHURA, L. 2006. The role of credit rationing in Czech agriculture - the case of large agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics (Czech). 2006, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 477-488. Go to original source...
  28. ČERNOŠA, S. 2002. Vnitroodvětvový obchod a vliv rozdílů ve velikosti zemí na případu Slovinska a ČR, Finance a úvěr. Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 355-370.
  29. ČSÚ. 2008. Vývoj zahraničního obchodu v roce 2007. Praha, Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu [on-line]. 2008 [cit. 2008-10-06]. Dostupný na: http://www.mpo.cz/dokument40224.html.
  30. EGAP. 2008. Výroční zpráva 2007. Praha: EGAP, 2008.
  31. EGAP. 2009. Výroční zpráva 2008. Praha: EGAP, 2009.
  32. EGGER, P.; URL, T. 2006. Public Export Credit Guarantees and Foreign Trade Structure: Evidence from Austria. The World Economy. 2006, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 399-418. Go to original source...
  33. FIDRMUC, J.; FIDRMUC, J. 2003. Disintegration and Trade. Review of International Economics. 2003, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 811-829. Go to original source...
  34. FIDRMUC, J. 2009. models in integrated panels. Empirical Economics. 2009, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 435-446. Go to original source...
  35. GALEOTTI, E.; RYŠAVÁ, E. 2008. Endogeneity Problem And FDI In Transition: Evidence From The Privatized Glass Sector. Prague Economic Papers. 2008, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 319-339. Go to original source...
  36. GALEOTTI, E.; RYŠAVÁ, E. 2009. of FDI in Czech Manufacturing Industries between 2000-2006. Working Papers IES 2009/17, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, 2009.
  37. GERŠL, A.; HEŘMÁNEK, J. 2008. Indicators of Financial System Stability: Towards an Aggregate Financial Stability Indicator? Prague Economic Papers. 2008, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 127-142. Go to original source...
  38. GERŠL, A. 2008., Export Performance, and Financing of the Czech Corporate Sector: The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver). 2008, Vol. 58, No. 5-6, pp. 232-247.
  39. GREENE, W. H. 2002. Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition. Pearson Education. New Jersey, 2002.
  40. GREGOROVÁ, L. 2008. Byrokratická bariéra kvality regulace. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 196-228. Go to original source...
  41. GRISWOLD, D. 2005. A Package Deal: U.S. Manufacturing Imports and Output Rise and Fall Together. Free Trade Bulletin, Center for trade policy studies [on-line]. 17/2005 [cit. 17.8.2009]. Dostupný na http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/FTBs/FTB-017.html#_edn1.
  42. GUNDEL, S. 2008. Declining German export prices due to increased competition from newly industrializing countries - evidence from Germany and the CEES. Prague Economic Papers, 2008, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 3-22. Go to original source...
  43. HÁJEK, M. 2008. Ekonomický růst v České republice a nových členských zemích Evropské Unie v období 1995 - 2006. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 435-448. Go to original source...
  44. HERRMANN, S.; JOCHEM, A. 2005. Trade balances of the central and east European EU member states and the role of foreign direct investment. Deutsche Bundesbank, Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies. 2005, No. 41. Go to original source...
  45. JAKAB, Z. M.; KOVÁCS, M. A.; OSZLAY, A. 2000. How Far Has Trade Integration Advanced? An Analysis of Actual and Potential Trade of Three Central and Eastern Europe Countries. National Bank of Hungary Working Paper. 2000, No. 1.
  46. JANDA, K. 2002. Model konkurenčního úvěrového trhu v podmínkách nedokonalých informací. Politická ekonomie. 2002, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 551-566. Go to original source...
  47. JANDA, K. 2003. Credit Guarantees in a Credit Market with Adverse Selection. Prague Economic Papers. 2003, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 331-349. Go to original source...
  48. JANDA, K. 2005. The Comparison of Credit Subsidies and Guarantees in Transition and Post-Transition Economies. Ekonomický časopis. 2005, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 383-398.
  49. JANDA, K. 2006. Analysis of the Budgetary Costs of the Supporting and Guarantee Agricultural and Forestry Fund. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 2006, Vol 56, No. 9-10, pp. 416-434.
  50. JANDA, K. 2007. Optimal Debt Contracts in Emerging Markets with Multiple Investors. Prague Economic Papers. 2007, Vol. 16, No. 24, pp. 115-129. Go to original source...
  51. JANDA, K. 2008a. Státní podpora českých vývozních úvěrů. Český finanční a účetní časopis. 2008, roč. 3, č. 1, s. 62-75. Go to original source...
  52. JANDA, K. 2008b. Teorie a praxe státních úvěrových podpor. Karolinum. 2008.
  53. JANDA, K. 2009. Bankruptcies with Soft Budget Constraint. Manchester School. 2009, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 430-460. Go to original source...
  54. JANDA, K. 2010. Public Support of Commercial Credit Provision. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 2010, v tisku.
  55. JANDA, K; Čajka, M. 2006. Podpora zemědělského úvěru na Slovensku a v České republice. Ekonomický časopis. 2006, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 139-153.
  56. JANDA, K; MICHALÍKOVÁ, E; POTÁCELOVÁ, V. 2009. Vyplácí se podporovat exportní úvěry? Working Papers IES 2009/30, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, 2009.
  57. JUDSON, R. A.; OWEN, A. L. 1996. Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Practical Guide for Macroeconomists. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economics Discussion Series. 1997, No. 3. Go to original source...
  58. LEVIN, A; LIN, C.; CHU, C. J. 2002. Panel Unit Root Tests: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics. 2002, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 1-24. Go to original source...
  59. MÁLEK, J.; RADOVÁ, J.; ŠTĚRBA, F. 2007. Konstrukce výnosové křivky pomocí vládních dluhopisů v České republice. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 792-808. Go to original source...
  60. MANDEL, M.; TOMŠÍK, V. 2008. Relativní verze teorie parity kupní síly: Problémy empirické verifikace. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 723- 738. Go to original source...
  61. MARTINCUS, C. V.; CARBALLO J. 2008. Is export promotion effective in developing countries? Firm-level evidence on the intensive and the extensive margins of exports. Journal of International Economics. 2008, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 89-106. Go to original source...
  62. MOSE R, C.; NESTMANN, T.; WEDOW, M. 2008. Political Risk and Export Promotion: Evidence from Germany. The World Economy. 2008, Vol. 31, No. 6, s. 781-803. Go to original source...
  63. NICKELL, S. 1981. Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica. 1981, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 1417-1426. Go to original source...
  64. O'BRIEN, M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quantity and Quality. 2007, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 673-690. Go to original source...
  65. POROJAN, A. 2001. Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited. Open Economies Review. 2001, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 265-280. Go to original source...
  66. POTÁCELOVÁ, V. 2009. Analýza úvěrové podpory poskytované ČEB. Diplomová práce, VŠE, Praha, 2009.
  67. PÖYHÖNEN, P. 1963. A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1963, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 93-99.
  68. ROUSSEEUW, P. J.; LEROY, A. M. 1987. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York, J. Wiley. Go to original source...
  69. SKUHROVEC, J. 2010. Analysis of LWS Empirical Properties Using Bootstrap Methods. Diplomová práce, FJFI ČVUT, Praha, 2010.
  70. ŠEVELA, M. 2002. Gravity-type model for Czech agricultural export. Agricultural Economics. 2002, Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 463-466. Go to original source...
  71. TICHÝ, F. 2007. Impact of accession to EMU on international trade - case of the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers. 2007, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 336-346. Go to original source...
  72. TINBERGEN, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund. 1962.
  73. TLAPA, M. aj. 2005. Exportní strategie České republiky pro období 2006 - 2010. Praha, Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu, 2005.
  74. TRUNEČEK, J. 2009. K problematice konkurenceschopnosti českých podniků v prostředí turbulence. Politická ekonomie. 2009, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 435-450. Go to original source...
  75. WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. 2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 2nd Edition. Mason, Ohio: South-Western - Thomson Learning.
  76. WORLD BANK. 2008. World developement indicators. Washington 2007.
  77. WTO. 2008. Agreement on subsidies and Countervailing measures. Ženeva, WTO [on-line]. 2008 revision [cit. 12.12.2008]. Dostupný na http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/24-scm_01_e.htm.
  78. Zákon 58/1995 o pojišťování a financování exportu se státní podporou
  79. ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. 2008. Státní podpora podniků a konkurenceschopnost odvětví. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 182-194. Go to original source...
  80. ZIA, B. H. 2008. Export incentives, financial constraints, and the (mis)allocation of credit: Micro-level evidence from subsidized export loans. Journal of Financial Economics. 2008, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 498-527. Go to original source...
  81. ŽÁK, M. 2005. Politické riziko v tranzitivních ekonomikách a v Evropské Unii. Politická ekonomie. 2005, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 3-30. Go to original source...
  82. ŽĎÁREK, V. 2009. Moderní způsoby produkce a přímé zahraniční investice. Politická ekonomie. 2009, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 509-543. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.