Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(4):542-565 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.746

Analýza chudoby na Slovensku založená na koncepte relatívnej deprivácie

Tomáš Želinský
Technická univerzita v Košiciach.

Analysis of Poverty in Slovakia Based on the Concept of Relative Deprivation

It is always difficult to define the one and only measure of poverty, as there are different concepts of poverty based on a number of welfare indicators. The paper discuses main approaches to individual welfare measurement. A measure of individual welfare in the concept of relative deprivation is proposed. Three dimensions of relative deprivation are considered (economic strain, inability to afford certain items, and housing). The measure is based on multiplicative approach and thus is more sensitive to changes and differences in data than measures based on additive approach. The measure reflects the complex nature of households' relative deprivation and is applied to Slovak EU SILC 2005 - 2008 microdata in order to analyze the level of poverty in Slovakia in the concept of relative deprivation. Three different poverty lines are applied to the data and results are compared. Level of poverty in terms of relative deprivation is decreasing in Slovakia over time. Using the proposed approach, the results strongly depend on the number of components included in each dimension, as well as the components itself. In accordance with economic changes in the society, in the further research reappraisal of certain components could be a matter of discussion in order to reflect the present situation.

Keywords: poverty estimation, relative deprivation, deprivation index, welfare index, EU SILC
JEL classification: I31, I32

Published: August 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Želinský, T. (2010). Analysis of Poverty in Slovakia Based on the Concept of Relative Deprivation. Politická ekonomie58(4), 542-565. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.746
Download citation

References

  1. AHLUWALIA, M. S. 1976. Inequality, poverty, and development. Journal of Development Economics. 1976, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 307-342. Go to original source...
  2. ALKIRE, S. 2005. Capability and Functionings: Definition and Justification [Briefing Notes]. Cambridge: Human Development and Capability Association, 2005.
  3. BALÁŽ, V. 2006. Politická ekonómia slovenského kapitalizmu: Inštitucionálna a evolučná perspektíva. Politická ekonomie. 2006, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 610-631. Go to original source...
  4. BAUER, M.; CHYTILOVÁ, J. 2007. Opomíjená heterogenita lidí aneb proč Afrika dlouhodobě neroste. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 72-90. Go to original source...
  5. DESAI, M.; SHAH, A. 1988. An Econometric Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. Oxford Economic Papers. New Series. September 1988, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 505-522. Go to original source...
  6. DIEWERT, W. E. 2004. The axiomatic and stochastic approaches to index number theory. In Consumer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice. Ženeva: ILO. ISBN 92-2-113699-X.
  7. DUCLOS, J. Y.; ARAAR, A. 2006. Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy and Estimation with DAD. New York: Springer, 2006. ISBN 978-0387-33318-2. Go to original source...
  8. DŽAMBAZOVIČ, R. et al. 2008. Vytvorenie národných indikátorov v oblasti chudoby a sociálneho vylúčenia a návrh spôsobu zabezpečenia ich pravidelného monitorovania [Analytická štúdia]. Bratislava: Euroformes, 2008. ISBN: 978-80-90266-21-0.
  9. EUROSTAT. 2009. Algorithms to Compute Indicators in the Streamlined Social Inclusion Portfolio Based on EU-SILC and Adopted under the Open Method of Coordination (OMC). Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2009.
  10. EUROSTAT. 2010. Combating poverty and social exclusion: A statistical portrait of the European Union 2010. Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2010. ISBN 978-92-79-13443-2.
  11. EURÓPSKY PARLAMENT. 2008. Rozhodnutie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady č. 1098/2008/ES z 22. októbra 2008 o Európskom roku boja proti chudobe a sociálnemu vylúčeniu (2010) [Úradný vestník Európskej únie, L 298/20]. Brusel: Európsky parlament, 2008.
  12. FILADELFIOVÁ, J. 2007. Životný cyklus: Vek, životný cyklus a medzigeneračný prenos chudoby. In GERBERY, D., LESAY, I., ŠKOBLA, D. (ed.): Kniha o chudobe: Spoločenské súvislosti a verejné politiky. Bratislava: Priatelia Zeme-CEPA, 2007, pp. 9-28. ISBN 978-80-968918-9-4.
  13. FOSTER, J.; GREER, J.; THORBECKE, E. 1984. A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica. May 1984, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 761-766. Go to original source...
  14. HAGENAARS, A.; DE VOS, K. 1988. The Definition and Measurement of Poverty. The Journal of Human Resources. Spring 1988, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 211-221. Go to original source...
  15. HAGENAARS, A.; VAN PRAAG, B. 1985. A Synthesis of Poverty Definitions. Review of Income and Wealth. 1985, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 139-154. Go to original source...
  16. HAUGHTON, J.; KHANDKER, S. R. 2009. Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2009. ISBN 978-0-8213-7613-3.
  17. HÁJEK, M. 2008. Ekonomický růst v České republice a nových členských zemích Evropské unie v období 1995 - 2006. Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 435-448. Go to original source...
  18. HOLMAN, R. et. al. 2005. Dějiny ekonomického myšlení. 3. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2005. ISBN 80-7179-380-9.
  19. HOŘEJŠÍ, B. et al. 2006. Mikroekonomie. 4. rozš. vyd. Praha: Management Press, 2006. ISBN 80-7261-150-X.
  20. CHESHER, A.; SCHLUTER, C. 2002. Welfare Measurement and Measurement Error. The Review of Economic Studies. April 2002, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 357-378. Go to original source...
  21. KHEMANI, R. S.; SHAPIRO, D. M. 1993. Glossary of Industrial Organisation Economics and Competition Law. Paris: OECD Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, 1993.
  22. KRISHNAKUMAR, J. 2005. Going beyond functionings to capabilities: an econometric model to explain and estimate capabilities. In: The many dimensions of poverty. [International Conference. Brasilia, Brazília, 29. - 31. august 2005]. Brasilia: International Poverty Centre (UNDP), 2005.
  23. LABUDOVÁ, V.; VOJTKOVÁ, M.; LINDA, B. 2010. Aplikácia viacrozmerných metód pri meraní chudoby. E & M Ekonomie a management. 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 6-22.
  24. LIPTON, M. 1988. The Poor and the Poorest: Some Interim Findings. Washington, DC: Svetová banka, 1988. ISBN 0-8213-1034-8.
  25. LIPTON, M.; RAVALLION, M. 1993. Poverty and Policy [Policy Research Working Paper Series 1130]. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1993.
  26. MCKENZIE, G. W.; PEARCE, I. F. 1982. Welfare Measurement: A Synthesis. The American Economic Review. September 1982, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 669-682.
  27. OKÁLI, I. et al. 2008. Hospodársky vývoj Slovenska v roku 2007. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 435-476.
  28. OKÁLI, I. et al. 2009. Hospodársky vývoj Slovenska v roku 2008. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics. 2009, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 524-567.
  29. PAUHOFOVÁ, I.; PÁLENÍK, V. 2005. Dôchodková situácia a formovanie spotrebiteľských zvyklostí obyvateľstva Slovenska. In: Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics. 2005, Vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 972-990.
  30. PRADHAN, M.; RAVALLION, M. 2000. Measuring Poverty Using Qualitative Perceptions of Consumption Adequacy. The Review of Economics and Statistics. August 2000, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 462-471. Go to original source...
  31. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Viedeň: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.Rproject.org.
  32. RAVALLION, M. 1992. Poverty comparisons: A guide to concepts and methods. Washington, D. C.: Svetová banka, 1992. ISBN 0-8213-2036-X.
  33. RAVALLION, M. 1996. Issues in Measuring and Modelling Poverty. The Economic Journal. September 1996, Vol. 106, No. 438, pp. 1328-1343. Go to original source...
  34. RAVALLION, M. 1998. Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice [LSMS Working Paper 133]. Washington, D. C.: Svetová banka, 1998. ISBN. 0-8213-4226-6. Go to original source...
  35. SEN, A. K. 1984. The Living Standard. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series. November 1984, Vol. 36, Supplement: Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes, pp. 74-90. Go to original source...
  36. SEN, A. K. 1999. Commodities and Capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. ISBN 0-19-565038-7.
  37. SIPKOVÁ, Ľ. 2009. Ekvivalentná škála v EU-SILC analýzach príjmovej nerovnosti a chudoby. In PACÁKOVÁ, V. (ed.): Štatistické metódy v ekonómii so zameraním na sociálne analýzy: monografický zborník z riešenia vedeckého projektu VEGA 1/4586/07. Bratislava: EKONÓM, 2009, pp. 81-126. ISBN 978-80-225-2704-0.
  38. SIROVÁTKA, T.; MAREŠ, P. 2006. Chudoba, deprivace, sociální vyloučení: nezaměstnaní a pracující chudí. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review. 2006, Vol. 42., No. 4, pp. 627-655. Go to original source...
  39. SMITH, A.; ROCHOVSKÁ, A. 2007. Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives and the geographies of post-socialist transformations. Geoforum. November 2007, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1163-1178. Go to original source...
  40. STANKOVIČOVÁ, I.; BARTOŠOVÁ, J. 2009. Príspevok k analýze subjektívnej chudoby v SR a ČR. Forum Statisticum Slovacum. 2009, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 151-161.
  41. STRENGMANN-KUHN, W. 2000. Theoretical Definition and Empirical Measurement of Welfare and Poverty: A Microeconomic Approach. [26th General Conference of The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth. Krakov, 27. 8. - 2. 9. 2000]. Ottawa: International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, 2000
  42. SUGDEN, R. 1993. Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature. December 1993, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1947-1962
  43. SVETOVÁ BANKA. 1993. Poverty Reduction Handbook. Washington, DC: Svetová banka, 1993. ISBN 0-8213-2356-3.
  44. SVETOVÁ BANKA. 2010. Global Economic Prospects: Crisis, Finance, and Growth. Washington, DC: Svetová banka, 2010. ISBN 978-0-8213-8226-4. Go to original source...
  45. ŠÚ SR. 2006. EU SILC 2005, UDB verzia 12/07/2006 [databáza s mikroúdajmi]. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR, 2006.
  46. ŠÚ SR. 2007a. EU SILC 2006: Zisťovanie o príjmoch a životných podmienkach domácností v SR. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR.
  47. ŠÚ SR. 2007b. EU SILC 2006, UDB verzia 15/05/2007 [databáza s mikroúdajmi]. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR, 2007.
  48. ŠÚ SR. 2008. EU SILC 2007, UDB verzia 20/08/2008 [databáza s mikroúdajmi]. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR, 2008.
  49. ŠÚ SR. 2009. EU SILC 2008, UDB verzia 10/09/2009 [databáza s mikroúdajmi]. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR, 2009.
  50. TOWNSEND, P. 1954. Measuring Poverty. The British Journal of Sociology. June 1954, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 130-137. Go to original source...
  51. TOWNSEND, P. 1962. The Meaning of Poverty. The British Journal of Sociology. September 1962, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 210-227. Go to original source...
  52. TOWNSEND, P. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books (Reprinted 1983). ISBN 0-14-022139-5. Go to original source...
  53. VINTROVÁ, R. 2008. Česká a slovenská ekonomika 15 let po rozdělení. In Politická ekonomie. 2008, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 449-466. Go to original source...
  54. VINTROVÁ, R. 2009. Lessons from the Czech and Slovak economies split. Prague Econonic Papers. 2009, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 3-25. Go to original source...
  55. VOJINOVIĆ, B.; OPLOTNIK, Ž. J. 2008. Real Convergence in the New EU Member States. Prague Econonic Papers. 2008, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 23-39. Go to original source...
  56. ZEMANOVÁ, Š. 2009. Amartya Kumar Sen - ekonom rozvoje a blahobytu, filozof svobody i bídy a hladu. In: Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics. 2009, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 587-599.
  57. ŽELINSKÝ, T. 2010. Porovnanie alternatívnych prístupov k odhadu individuálneho blahobytu domácností ohrozených rizikom chudoby. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 251-270.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.