Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(5):675-688 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.754

Vývoj metod komplexního hodnocení výkonnosti podniku

Marek Vochozka
Vysoká škola technická a ekonomická v Českých Budějovicích.

Development of Methods for Comprehensive Evaluation of Business Performance

There is need for stakeholders to assess business in terms of its financial situation at each stage of an enterprise. There are plentiful options. You can use the analysis of financial ratios and different Benchmarking methods. It seems advantageous to use methods of comprehensive evaluation of the company from the perspective of interpretation. The resulting value can be clearly classified in the appropriate interval, and thus can predict the future of the company. Most currently used methods for comprehensive evaluation of the company were founded on the basis of mathematical- statistical methods. Contribution analyzes models most frequently mentioned in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of using each method are summarized in each particular. In the second part the drawbacks addressed by the common attributes of all the mathematical and statistical methods. Of course, the use of probability and frequency limits the informative value of the mathematical and statistical methods. Moreover, mathematical and statistical models are becoming increasingly complex. Unfortunately, their informational value in any way grows substantially. The question therefore is whether to continue the development of evaluation methods on the basis of mathematical and statistical methods, or focus on other options such as neural networks.

Keywords: evaluation of the company, mathematical-statistical methods, bankruptcy, solvency, analysis
JEL classification: G39

Published: October 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vochozka, M. (2010). Development of Methods for Comprehensive Evaluation of Business Performance. Politická ekonomie, 58(5), 675-688. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.754
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ALTMAN, E. I. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance. 1968, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 589-609. Go to original source...
    2. ALTMAN, E. I.; AVERY, R. B.; EISENBEIS, R. A.; SINKEY, J. F. 1981. Application of classification techniques in business, banking and finance. Greenwich (Connecticut): JAI Press Inc., 249 s. ISBN: 0-89232-004-4.
    3. ALTMAN, E. I.; EISENBEIS, R. A. 1978. Financial applications of discriminant analysis: A clarification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, March 1978, pp. 185-195. Go to original source...
    4. ALTMAN, E. I.; HALDEMAN, R. G.; NARAYANAN, P. 1977. ZETA analysis: A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 29-51. Go to original source...
    5. ALTMAN, E. I.; NARAYANAN, P. 1997. An international survey of business failure classification models. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments. 1997, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-57. Go to original source...
    6. ALTMAN, E. I.; SAUNDERS, A. 1998. Credit risk measurement: Developments over the last 20 years. Journal of Banking and Finance. 1998, Vol. 21, No. 11-12, pp. 1721-1742. Go to original source...
    7. ASTEBRO, T.; WINTER, J. K. 2001, More than a dummy: the probability of failure, survival and acquisition of firms in financial distress. [Working Paper, September 2001, pp. 1-39]. Go to original source...
    8. BARNES, P. 1987. The analysis and use of financial ratios: A review article. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 1987, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1987, pp. 449-461. Go to original source...
    9. BEAVER, W. 1967. Financial ratios predictors of failure. Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies 1966. Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement to Vol. 4, s. 71-111. Go to original source...
    10. BILDERBEEK, J. 1973. Financieel-economische indices ten behoeve van de bedrijfsbeoordeling. Economisch en Sociaal Tijdschrift. April 1973, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 141-155.
    11. BLUM, M. 1974. Failing company discriminant analysis. Journal of Accounting Research. 1974, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-25. Go to original source...
    12. CYBINSKI, P. 2001. Description. Explanation, Prediction: The Evolution of Bankruptcy Studies? Managerial Finance. 2001, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 29-44. Go to original source...
    13. DAMBOLENA, I.; KHOURY, S. 1980. Ratio stability and corporate failure. Journal of Finance. 1980, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1017-1026. Go to original source...
    14. DEAKIN, E. 1976. On the nature of the distribution of financial accounting ratios: some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review. January 1976, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 90-97.
    15. DIMITRAS, A.; ZANAKIS, S.; ZOPUDINIS C. 1996. A survey of business failures with an emphasis on failure prediction methods and industrial applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 1996, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 487-513. Go to original source...
    16. DIRICKX, Y.; VAN LANDEGHEM, G. 1994. Statistical failure prevision problems. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management. 1994, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 429-462.
    17. DOUCHA, R. 1995. Bilanční analýza. Praha: Grada, 1995. 83 s. ISBN 80-85623-89-7.
    18. EISENBEIS, 1977. Pitfalls in the application of discriminant analysis in business. Journal of Finance. June 1977, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 875-900. Go to original source...
    19. EL-ZAYATY, A. 1987. Business failure prediction models: An empirical investigation of type II errors. Baruch College, The City University of New York, October 1987.
    20. GRÜNWALD, R. 2000. Finanční analýza pro oceňování podniku. Praha: Vysoká škola ekonomická, 2000. ISBN 80-245-0032-9.
    21. HOSMER, D. W.; LEMESHOW, S. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
    22. KARELS G. V.; PRAKASH A. J. 1987. Multivariate normality and forecasting of business bankruptcy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1987, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 573-593. Go to original source...
    23. KEASEY, K.; WATSON, R. 1991. Financial distress models: a review of their usefulness. British journal of Management. July 1991, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 89-102. Go to original source...
    24. LACHENBRUCH, P. A. 1975. Discriminant Analysis. New York: Hafner Press, 1975.
    25. MADDALA, G. S. 1977. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977.
    26. MCLEAY, S.; OMAR, A. 2000. The sensitivity of prediction models to the non-normality of bounded an unbounded financial ratios. British Accounting Review. 2000, Vol. 32, pp. 213-230. Go to original source...
    27. MENSAH, Y. M. 1984. An examination of the stationarity of multivariate bankruptcy prediction models: A methodological study. Journal of Accounting Research. 1984, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 380-395. Go to original source...
    28. MOSES, D.; LIAO, S. S. 1987. On developing models for failure prediction. Journal of Commercial Bank Lending. 1987, Vol. 69, pp. 27-38.
    29. NEUMAIEROVÁ, I. 1998. Řízení hodnoty. Praha: VŠE, 1998. 137 s. ISBN 80-7079-921-8.
    30. OHLSON, J. 1980. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research. 1980, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 109-131. Go to original source...
    31. OOGHE, H.; JOOS, P.; EN DE VOS, D. 1990. Risico-indicator voor een onderneming aan de hand van falingspredictie-modellen. Accountancy en Bedrijfskunde Kwartaalschrift. September 1993, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 3-26.
    32. OOGHE, H.; VERBAERE, E. 1985. Predicting business failure on the basis of accounting data: The Belgian experience. The International Journal of Accounting. 1985, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 19-44.
    33. PIESSE, J.; WOOD, D. 1992. Issues in assessing MDA models of corporate failure: A research note. British Accounting Review. 1992, Vol. 24, pp. 33-42. Go to original source...
    34. PLATT, H. D.; PLATT, M. B. 1990. Development of a class of stable predictive variables: the case of bankruptcy prediction. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1990, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 31-51. Go to original source...
    35. POMPE, P.; BILDERBEEK, J. 2000. Faillissementspredictie: een vergelijking tussen lineaire discriminant analyse en neurale netwerken. Economisch Sociaal Tijdschrift. 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 215-242.
    36. SEDLÁČEK, J. 2007. Finanční analýza podniku. Brno: Computer Press, 2007. 154 s. ISBN 978-80251-1830-6.
    37. STEELE, A. 1995. Going concern qualifications and bankruptcy prediction. Prezentováno na konferenci European Accounting Association, únor 1995, s. 1-28.
    38. SYNEK, M.; KOPKÁNĚ, H.; KUBÁLKOVÁ, M. 2009. Manažerské výpočty a ekonomická analýza. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2009. 301 s. ISBN 978-80-7400-154-3.
    39. TAFFLER, R. J. 1982. Forecasting company failure in the UK using discriminant analysis and financial ratio data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1982, Vol. 145, part 3, pp. 342-358. Go to original source...
    40. TAFFLER, R. J. 1983. The assessment of company solvency and performance using a statistical model. Accounting and Business Research. 1983, Vol. 15, No. 52, pp. 295-307. Go to original source...
    41. TAFFLER, R. J.; AGARWAL, V. 2003. Do statistical failure prediction models work ex ante or only ex post? Paper presented in the Deloitte & Touche Lecture Series on credit risk, University of Antwerp, únor 2003, Belgium.
    42. TAMARI, M. 1966. Financial ratios as a means of forecasting bankruptcy. Management International Review. 1966, Vol. 4, pp. 15-21.
    43. ZAVGREN, C. 1983. The prediction of corporate failure: the state of the art. Journal of Accounting Literature. 1983, Vol. 2, pp. 1-37.
    44. ZMIJEWSKI, M. E. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement to Vol. 22, pp. 59-86. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content