Politická ekonomie 2011, 59(3):329-344 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.794

Falešná neutralita neoklasické teorie: feministická, antropologická, evoluční a ekologická kritika

Ondřej Horký
Ústav mezinárodních vztahů, Praha.

The False Neutrality of the Neoclassical Theory: Feminist, Anthropological, Evolutionary and Ecological Critiques

The article argues that many failures of economic policies, especially in the developing world, are accountable to the methodological biases of the underlying mainstream economic science. While the new institutional and development economics have substantially improved economic models, they still rely on the neoclassical assumptions of methodological individualism and utilitarism. Therefore, they cannot fully grasp the gender and cultural aspects of the societies living in developing countries, the dynamic character of their economies and their embedment in the natural, social and institutional environment. These scientific biases are analysed from the standpoint of four heterodox economic schools: those of feminist economics, evolutionary economics, ecological economics, and economic anthropology. The subsequent failure of the economic policies is documented by the cross-cutting example of the Structural Adjustment Programmes of the Bretton Woods institutions. The article concludes by emphasizing the common points of the heterodox schools and advocating for a methodological plurality in the Czech economic research and education.

Keywords: economic development, Economic methodology, heterodox economics, feminist economics, economic anthropology, evolutionary economics, Structural Adjustment Programmes
JEL classification: B41, B52, B54, O19, Q57

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Horký, O. (2011). The False Neutrality of the Neoclassical Theory: Feminist, Anthropological, Evolutionary and Ecological Critiques. Politická ekonomie, 59(3), 329-344. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.794
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ALESKEROV, F.; BOUYSSOU, D.; MONJARDET, B. 2007. Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
    2. BARBERĄ, S.; HAMMOND, P. J.; SEIDL, C. (ed.) 2004. Handbook of Utility Theory: Extensions. Berlin: Springer, 2004. Go to original source...
    3. BATAILLE, G. 1967. La part maudite; précédé de La notion de dépense. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1967.
    4. BECKER, G. S. 1962. Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy 1962, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 1-13. Go to original source...
    5. BECKER, G. S.; LEWIS, H. G. 1973. On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. The Journal of Political Economy. 1973, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 279-288. Go to original source...
    6. BECKER, G. S. 1993. Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior. Journal of Political Economy. 1993, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 385-409. Go to original source...
    7. BECKER, G. S. 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1996. Go to original source...
    8. BERGH, J. C. J. M. V. D. 2007. Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2007, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 521-549. Go to original source...
    9. BLAUG, M. 1998. The Formalist Revolution of What Happened to Orthodox Economics After World War II. Discussion papers, 1998, Vol. School of Business and Economics, University of Exeter No. 98/10.
    10. BOULDING, K. E. 1981. Evolutionary Economics. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.
    11. COASE, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 1937, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 386-405. Go to original source...
    12. COASE, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-44. Go to original source...
    13. COLANDER, D. 2000. The Death of Neoclassical Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 127-143. Go to original source...
    14. DAWKINS, R. 1999. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    15. DE BEER, F.; SWANEPOEL, H. 2000. Introduction to Development Studies. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    16. DOPFER, K. 1994. Development Theory. In HODGSON, G. M. et al. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics. Hants: Edward Elgar, 1994. vol. 1, pp. 145-152.
    17. ELSON, D. 2006. Women's Rights and Engendering Development. In KUIPER, E. et al. (ed.) Feminist Economics and the World Bank. History, theory and policy. London: Routledge, 2006. pp. 243-255. Go to original source...
    18. EVERS, B. 2003. Broadening the Foundations of Macro-economic Models through a Gender Approach: New Developments. In GUTIÉRREZ, M. (ed.) Macro-Economics: Making Gender Matter - Concepts Policies and Institutional Change in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books, 2003. pp. 3-21.
    19. FERBER, M. A.; NELSON, J. A. (ed.) 1993. Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. Go to original source...
    20. FERBER, M. A.; NELSON, J. A. (ed.) 2003. Feminist Economics Today: Beyond Economic Man. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2003. Go to original source...
    21. FERGUSON, J. 1997. The Anti-politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
    22. FOLBRE, N.; NELSON, J. A. 2000. For Love or Money - Or Both? Journal of Economic Pespectives, 2000, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 123-140. Go to original source...
    23. FRIEDMAN, M. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
    24. GÉRAUD, M.-O.; LESEVOISIER, O.; POTTIER, R. 2000. Les notions clé de l'ethnologie. Analyses et textes. Paris: Armand Colin, 2000.
    25. GREENWOOD, D. T.; HOLT, R. P. F. 2008. Institutional and Ecological Economics: The Role of Technology and Institutions in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Issues. 2008, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 445-452. Go to original source...
    26. GRIETHUYSEN, P. V. 2002. La contribution de l'économie évolutive dans la problématique du développement durable. Université de Genève, 2002.
    27. HARRIS, J. 2002. The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches in International Development. World Development. 2002, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 487-496. Go to original source...
    28. HAUSMAN, D. 1998. Philosophy of Economics. In CRAIG, E. (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy London: Routledge, 1998. vol. 3, pp. 212-222.
    29. HEINSOHN, G.; STEIGER, O. 2000. The Property Theory of Interest and Money. In SMITHIN, J. (ed.) What is Money? London: Routledge, 2000. pp. 67-100.
    30. HENRICH, J.; BOYD, R.; BOWLES, S. et al. 2005. "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2005, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 795-855. Go to original source...
    31. HODGSON, G. M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History. The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge, 2001.
    32. CHEN, S.; RAVALLION, M. 2007. Absolute Poverty Measures for the Developing World, 1981-2004. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2007, No. 4211. Go to original source...
    33. CHEN, S.; RAVALLION, M. 2008. The Developing World Is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2008, No. 4703. Go to original source...
    34. KAHNEMAN, D.; WAKKER, P. P.; SARIN, R. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. Quarterly Journal of Economic. 1997, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 175-405. Go to original source...
    35. KAHNEMAN, D.; THALER, R. H. 2006. Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 221-234. Go to original source...
    36. KAPP, K. W. 1961. Toward a Science of Man in Society. A Positive Approach to the Integration of Social Knowledge. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1961.
    37. KAPP, K. W. 1971. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. New York: Schocken Books, 1971.
    38. KAUL, I.; GRUNBERG, I.; STERN, M. A. (ed.) 1999. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Go to original source...
    39. KUIPER, E.; BAKER, D. K. (ed.) 2006. Feminist Economics and the World Bank. History, Theory and Policy. London: Routledge, 2006. Go to original source...
    40. MAHIEU, F.-R. 1990. Les fondements de la crise économique en Afrique. Entre la pression communautaire et le marché international. Paris: Harmattan, 1990.
    41. MAHIEU, F.-R. 2001. Ethique économique. Fondements anthropologiques. Paris: Harmattan, 2001.
    42. MALINOWSKI, B. 2008. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Malinowski Press, 2008.
    43. MAUSS, M. 2002. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés primitives. 2002. Go to original source...
    44. MCCONNELL, C. R.; BRUE, S. L. 2005. Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2005.
    45. MELLOR, M. 2005. Ecofeminist Political Economy: Integrating Feminist Economics and Ecological Economics. Feminist Economics. 2005, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 120-132.
    46. MIES, M.; SHIVA, V. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books, 1993. Go to original source...
    47. MOHAN, G.; BROWN, E.; MILWARD, B. et al. 2000. Structural Adjustment: Theory, Practice and Impacts. London: Routledge, 2000.
    48. MYRDAL, G. 1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: G. Duckworth, 1957.
    49. MYRDAL, G. 1968. Asian Drama. London: Penguin Books, 1968.
    50. MYRDAL, G. 1984. International Inequality and Foreign Aid. In MEIER, G. M. et al.. (ed.) Pioneers in Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. pp. 149-165.
    51. NELSON, J. A. 1995. Feminism and Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1995, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 131-148. Go to original source...
    52. NELSON, J. A. 2004. Freedom, Reason and More: Feminist Economics and Human Development. Journal of Human Development. 2004, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 309-333. Go to original source...
    53. NORTH, D. C. 1992. Institutions and Economic Theory. American Economist. 1992, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 3-6. Go to original source...
    54. NURKSE, R. 1953. Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
    55. ORTNER, S. 1979. Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture? In ROSALDO, M. Z. et al. (ed.) Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979. pp. 67-87.
    56. PERKINS, E.; KUIPER, E. 2005. Introduction: Exploring Feminist Ecological Economics. Feminist Economics. 2005, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 107-108. Go to original source...
    57. POLANYI, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 1957.
    58. ROGERS, S. C. 1979. Espace masculin, espace féminin. Essai sur la différence. Etudes rurales. 1979, No. 74, pp. 87-110. Go to original source...
    59. SAHLINS, M. 1997. The Original Affluent Society. In RAHNEMA, M. et al. (ed.) The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books, 1997. pp. 3-21.
    60. SEERS, D. 1976. The limitations of the special case. In MEIER, G. (ed.) Leading issues in Economics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. pp. 53-58.
    61. SIMON, D. (ed.) 2006. Fifty Key Thinkers on Development. London: Routledge, 2006. Go to original source...
    62. SIMONS, P. 1997. 'Women in Development': A Threat to Liberation. In RAHNEMA, M. et al. (ed.) The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books, 1997. pp. 244-255.
    63. SMITH, A. 1998. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations: A Selected Edition by Kathryn Sutherland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
    64. STEIGER, O. 2006. Property Economics versus New Institutional Economics: Alternative Foundations of How to Trigger Economic Development. Journal of Economic Issues. 2006, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 183-208. Go to original source...
    65. STEIN, H. 1997. Institutional Theories and Structural Adjustment in Africa. In HARRIS, J. et al. (ed.) The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, 1997. pp. 109-132.
    66. STIGLER, G. J. 1950. The Development of Utility Theory. I. Journal of Political Economy. 1950, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 307-327. Go to original source...
    67. STOELHORST, J.-W. 2008. Darwinian Foundations for Evolutionary Economics. Journal of Economic Issues. 2008, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 415-423. Go to original source...
    68. TODARO, M.; SMITH, S. 2003. Economic Development. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
    69. UNDP. 1995. Human Development Report 1995: Gender and Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. Go to original source...
    70. VEBLEN, T. 1961. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. New York: Russel & Russel, 1961.
    71. WIREDU, K. 2005. On the Idea of a Global Ethic. Journal of Global Ethics. 2005, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-51. Go to original source...
    72. WORLD BANK. 2001. Engendering Development: Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    73. ZAOUAL, H. 1997. The Economy and Symbolic Sites in Africa. In RAHNEMA, M. et al. (ed.) The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books, 1997. pp. 30-39.
    74. ZEIN-ELABDIN, E. 1996. Development, Gender, and the Environment: Theoretical or Contextual Link? Toward an Institutional Analysis of Gender. Journal of Economic Issues. 1996, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 929-946. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content