Politická ekonomie 2011, 59(3):359-378 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.796

Reakce poptávky domácností po energii na zvyšování energetické účinnosti: teorie a její důsledky pro konstrukci empiricky ověřitelných modelů

Stela Rubínová
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí, Institut mezinárodních a rozvojových studií (IHEID), Ženeva.

Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models

Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced energy service becomes cheaper and economic theory then suggests that consumers should demand more of it, which will cause a loss of the potential technological saving. The phenomenon is called the rebound effect and it has become a focus of energy economists since early 80s. However, even today there is no clear consensus on its importance. Quantification of the rebound effect is mainly hampered by poor data availability and the comparison of results is not straightforward due to methodological differences. Our study concentrates right on the economic theory of the demand for energy services, definitions and their applicability to empirical estimation. It summarizes the state of knowledge and elaborates on plausible models for empirical quantification of the rebound effect which should bear consistent results.

Keywords: rebound effect, energy efficiency, energy demand, household demand
JEL classification: D11, P48, Q01, Q41

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rubínová, S. (2011). Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models. Politická ekonomie59(3), 359-378. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.796
Download citation

References

  1. BECKER, G. S. 1965. A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal. 1965, No. 75, pp. 493-517. Go to original source...
  2. BERKHOUT, P. H. G.; MUSKENS, J. C.; VELTHUISEN, J. W. 2000. Defining the Rebound Effect. Energy Policy. 2000, Vol. 6-7, No. 28, pp. 425-432. Go to original source...
  3. BINSWANGER, M. 2001. Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What about the Rebound Effect? Ecological Economics. 2001, Vol.1, No. 36, pp. 119-132. Go to original source...
  4. BROOKES, L. G. 1990. The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in the Energy Efficiency Solution. Energy Policy. 1990, Vol. 2, No. 18, pp. 199-201. Go to original source...
  5. BROOKES, L. G. 2000. Energy Efficiency Fallacies Revisited. Energy Policy. 2000, No. 28, pp. 355-366. Go to original source...
  6. DUBIN, J. A.; McFADDEN, D. L. 1984. An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption. Econometrica. 1984, Vol. 2, No. 52, pp. 345-362. Go to original source...
  7. FRONDEL, M.; PETERS, J.; VANCE, C. 2008. Identifying the Rebound: Evidence from a German Household Panel. The Energy Journal. 2008, Vol. 4, No. 29, pp. 154-163. Go to original source...
  8. FRONDEL, M.; VANCE, C. 2009. Do High Oil Prices Matter? Evidence on the Mobility Behavior of German Households. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2009, Vol. 1, No. 43, pp. 81-94. Go to original source...
  9. GOLDBERG, P. K. 1996. The Effect of the Corporate Average Fuel Effciency Standards. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. 1996. [NBER Working Paper No. 5673] Dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w5673.
  10. GREENE, D. L. 1992. Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How Big Is the "Rebound" Effect? The Energy Journal. 1992, Vol. 1, No. 13, pp. 117-143. Go to original source...
  11. GREENE, D. L.; KAHN, J. R.; GIBSON, R. C. 1999. Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for U.S. Household Vehicles. The Energy Journal. 1999, Vol. 3, No. 20, pp. 1-31. Go to original source...
  12. GREENING, L. A.; GREENE, D. L.; DIFIGLIO, C. 2000. Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy. 2000, Vol. 6-7, No. 28, pp. 389-401. Go to original source...
  13. HAAS, R.; SHIPPER, L. 1998. Residential Energy Demand in OECD-Countries and the Role of Irreversible Efficiency Improvements. Energy Economics. 1998, Vol. 4, No. 20, pp. 421-442. Go to original source...
  14. HAUSMAN, J. A. 1979. Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables. The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979, Vol. 1, No. 10, pp. 33-54. Go to original source...
  15. HECKMAN, J. J. 1978. Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System. Econometrica. 1978, Vol. 6, No. 46, pp. 931-960. Go to original source...
  16. KHAZZOOM, J. D. 1980. Economic Implications of Mandated Economic Standards for Household Appliances. The Energy Journal. 1980, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 21-40. Go to original source...
  17. KHAZZOOM, J. D. 1987. Energy Savings Resulting from Adoption of More Efficient Appliances. The Energy Journal. 1987, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 85-89. Go to original source...
  18. KHAZZOOM, J. D. 1989. Energy Savings from More Efficient Appliances - A Rejoinder. The Energy Journal. 1989, Vol. 1, No. 10, pp. 157-166. Go to original source...
  19. McFADDEN, D. 1978. Modelling the Choice of Residential Location. In KARLQVIST, A., LUNDQVIST, L., SNICKARS, F. A WEIBULL, J. (eds) Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.
  20. NESBAKKEN, R. 2001. Energy Consumption for Space Heating: A Discrete-Continuous Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2001, Vol. 1, No. 103, pp. 165-184. Go to original source...
  21. SMALL, K. A.; VAN DENDER, K. 2006. Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect. [UC Irvine Economics Working Paper No. 05-06-03.] Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine. 2006. Dostupné na http://www.economics.uci.edu/docs/2005-06/Small-03.pdf.
  22. SORREL, S.; DIMITROPOULOS, J. 2007. UKERC Review of Evidence for the Direct Rebound Effect. Technical report 2: Econometric studies. [Working paper UKERC/WP/TPA/2007/010.] The Sussex Energy Group for the Technology and Policy Assessment function of the UK Energy Research Centre, 2007. Dostupné na http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-index.php?page=ReboundEffect.
  23. SORREL, S.; DIMITROPOULOS, J. 2008. The Rebound Effect: Microeconomic Definitions, Limitations and Extensions. Ecological Economics. 2008, No. 65, pp. 636-649. Go to original source...
  24. SORREL, S.; DIMITROPOULOS, J.; SOMMERVILLE, M. 2009. Empirical Estimates of the Direct Rebound Effect: A Review. Energy Policy. 2009, No.37, pp. 1356-1371. Go to original source...
  25. VAN DEN BERGH, J. C. J. M. 2011. Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy. Evironmental and Resource Economics. 2011, No. 48, pp. 43-58. Go to original source...
  26. WEST, S. E. 2004. Distributional Effects of Alternative Vehicle Pollution Control Policies. Journal of Public Economics. 2004, No. 88, pp. 735-757. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.