Politická ekonomie 2012, 60(1):40-57 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.831

Mandatorní výdaje a flexibilita fiskální politiky v ČR

Vojtěch Roženský
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

Mandatory Expenditure and the Flexibility of Fiscal Policy in the Czech Republic

This paper deals with the development of mandatory expenditure and its effect on the flexibility of fiscal policy in the Czech Republic. Fiscal flexibility is measured by the Steuerle-Roeper index of fiscal democracy, which expresses the proportion of budgetary revenue that remains after covering mandatory expenditure, i.e. the proportion of resources available for discretionary spending. The lower the value of the index, the lower the flexibility of fiscal resources. A negative value indicates that tax revenue is not sufficient to cover mandatory expenditure and the government has no resources available for discretionary spending. The analysis of Czech fiscal data from the period between 1995 and 2009 shows, that even though the share of mandatory expenditure increases, the flexibility of fiscal policy is still substantially better compared to Germany. The results of the comparison with the United States are ambiguous, depending on methodology. Some of the possible determinants of fiscal flexibility were tested by OLS regression. The analysis confirmed a negative relation of unemployment rate with the index of fiscal democracy. Panel regression also indicates a positive effect of GDP growth and a negative effect of the debt-to-GDP ratio. The effect of population ageing was not confirmed.

Keywords: fiscal policy, mandatory expenditure, index of fiscal democracy
JEL classification: H61

Published: February 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Roženský, V. (2012). Mandatory Expenditure and the Flexibility of Fiscal Policy in the Czech Republic. Politická ekonomie, 60(1), 40-57. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.831
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ANDERSON, B. 2009. Design of Budget Systems and Fiscal Outcomes. Přednáška na konferenci 6th Annual Meeting of OECD Asian Senior Budget Officials, Bangkok, 2009.
    2. AUERBACH, A. J. 2003. Fiscal Policy, Past and Present. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2003, vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. 75-138. Go to original source...
    3. AUERBACH, A. J.; GALE, W. G. 2009. Activist Fiscal Policy to Stabilize Economic Activity [Working Paper No. 15407]. Cambridge (MA): NBER, 2009. Go to original source...
    4. ATTINASI, M.; CHECHERITA, C.; NICKEL, C. 2009. What Explain the Surge in Euro Area Sovereign Spreads during the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009? [Working Paper No. 1131]. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2009. Go to original source...
    5. BRENDNER, A.; DRAZEN, A. 2009. Do Leaders Affect Government Spending Priorities? [Working Paper No. 15368]. Cambridge (MA): NBER, 2009. Go to original source...
    6. FELDSTEIN, M. S. 2009. Rethinking the Role of Fiscal Policy. American Economic Review. 2009, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 556-559. Go to original source...
    7. FELDSTEIN, M. S. 2010. Preventing a National Debt Explosion [Working Paper No. 16451]. Cambridge (MA): NBER, 2010. Go to original source...
    8. FERRARESI, P. M.; MONTICONE, C. 2009. A Semi-Aggregated Model for Social Expenditure Projections. [Research Report No. 62]. Brussels: European Network of Economic Policy Research Institute, 2009. Go to original source...
    9. GREENSPAN, A. 2008. The Age of Turbulence. London: Penguin Books, 2008. ISBN 978-0-141-02991-7.
    10. IZÁK, V.; DUFKOVÁ, E. 2006. Výdaje na sociální péči - nové státy Evropské unie a Česká republika. Politická ekonomie. 2006, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 762-777. Go to original source...
    11. KAPPE, R. 2009. Wheat from Chaff: Sensitivity Analysis of the Levels of Social Expenditure in OECD Countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, Chicago 2009.
    12. LEAMER, E. E. 1985. Sensitivity Analyses Would Help. American Economic Review. 1985, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 308-313.
    13. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. 2006. Průhledný státní rozpočet? Kudy tečou a kam prosakují naše veřejné finance. Praha: Transparency International - Česká republika, 2006. www.transparency.cz/pdf/publikace/rozpocet_studie_01.pdf. ISBN 80-903032-8-5.
    14. KREJDL, A. 2006. Fiscal Sustainability - Definition, Indicators and Assessment of Czech Public Finance Sustainability [Working Paper No. 3/2006]. Praha: ČNB, 2006.
    15. OLSON, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-03079-2.
    16. PIERSON, P. 1998. The Deficit and the Politics of Domestic Reform. In WEIR, M. (ed). Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1998. ISBN 0-8157-9288-3.
    17. ROSE, R. 1990. Inheritance before Choices in Public Policy. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1990, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 263-291. Go to original source...
    18. SALA-I-MARTIN, X. 1997. I Just Ran Two Million Regressions. American Economic Review. 1997, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 178-183. Go to original source...
    19. STEUERLE, E. 2007. Defining Our Long-Term Fiscal Challenges. Přednáška pro Senate Budget Committee, Washington, 2007.
    20. STEUERLE, E. 2010. Budget for a Declining Nation. Přednáška pro National Economists Club, Washington 2010.
    21. STEUERLE, E. 2010. The US Is Broke? Here's Why. USA Today. January 27, 2010.
    22. STREECK, W.; MERTENS, D. 2010. An Index of Fiscal Democracy [Working Paper 10/3]. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 2010.
    23. SUNSHINE, R. A. 2010. Mandatory Spending. Prezentace pro Congressional Budget Office, Washington, 2010.
    24. TANZI, V.; SCHUKNECHT, L. 2000. Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. ISBN 0 521 66410 1. Go to original source...
    25. MINISTERSTVO FINANCÍ ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. 2010. Konvergenční program České republiky. Praha: Ministerstvo financí České republiky, 2010.
    26. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2009. Sustainability Report 2009. Luxembourg: European Commission, Directorate General, Economic and Financial Affairs, 2009.
    27. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2010. Statistical Annex of European Economy Spring 2010. European Commission, Directorate General ECFIN, Economic and Financial Affairs, 2010.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content