Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 60 No. 1

Dopad investičních pobídek na objem investic v České republice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.833

[plný text (PDF)]

Peter Bolcha, Alena Zemplinerová

The policy of investment incentives is applied in majority of countries all over the world. This popularity is in contradiction with rare academic analyses. This paper sheds some light on causal impact of such policy on investment of supported firms in Czech Republic. We use individual level panel data containing crucial observables about the firm behaviour. We overcome the selection problem by application of propensity score matching. Our comparison of investment behaviour of supported firms and firms from control group shows that the extra investment generated (or maybe only accelerated) was at most 26% of contracted amounts. Even with constraints and assumptions we explicitly discuss in our work, this indicates that the arguments for the provision of this policy in Czech economy are not valid. These findings are in line with mixed (but mostly similar) empirical evidence from other countries.

JEL klasifikace: F21, H25

ANGRIST, J. D. 1998. Estimating the Labor Market Impact of Voluntary Military Service Using Social Security Data on Military Applicants. Econometrica. 1998, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 249–288.

BALDWIN, R.; FRÉDERIC R. 2002. Entry and Asymmetric Lobbing: Why Governments Pick Loosers [Working Paper No. 8756], NBER, 2/2002.

BANGA, R. 2003. Impact of Government Policies and Investment Agreements on FDI Infl ows to

Developing Countries: An Empirical Evidence. [Working Paper No. 116], Indian Council for

Research on International Economic Relations, http://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/icrier/116.html.

BECKER, S. O.; ICHINO, A. 2002. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity

scores. The Stata Journal. 2002, Vol. 2, No. 4: pp. 358–377.

BILLINGTON, N. 1999. The location of foreign direct investment: An Empirical Analysis. Applied

economics. 1999, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 65–76.

BOLCHA, P. 2008. O výpočte fiškálneho dopadu investičnej podpory. Politická ekonomie. 2008,

Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 257–274. ISSN 0032-3233

BRESNAHAN T. F.; REISS P. C. 1991. Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets. The Journal of Political Economy. 1991, Vol. 99, No. 5, pp. 977–1009.

BRONZINI, R.; DE BLASIO, G. 2006. Evaluating the Impact of Investment Incentives: The Case of

Italy´s Law 488/1992. Journal of Urban Economics. 2006, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 327–349.

CALIENDO, M.; KOEPNING, S. 2008. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity

Score Matching, [Working Paper No. 1588], IZA Discussion Papers, http://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/


CANNARI, L.; D’AURIZIO, L.; DE BLASIO, G. 2007. The effectiveness of investment subsidies:

Evidence from survey data. The Journal of the Italian Economic Association. 12/2007, Vol. 12,

No. 3, pp. 329–346.

DEMEKAS, D. G.; HORVÁTH, B.; RIBAKOVA, E.; YI WU. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment in Southeastern Europe: How (and How Much) Can Policies Help? [IMF Working Paper WP 05/110, 6/2005] http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp05110.pdf

DINGA, M. 2010. Do Investment Incentives Attract More FDI? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach. [Working paper, CERGE-EI], www.cergeei.cz/pdf/gdn/RRCVIII_83_paper_01.pdf.

FAINI, R.; SCHIANTARELLI, F. 1987. Incentives and Investment Decisions: The Effectiveness of

Regional Policy. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series. 9/1987, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 516–533.

GLOBERMAN, S.; SHAPIRO, D. M. 1998: The Impact of Government Policies on Foreign Direct

Investment: The Canadian Experience. Journal of International Business Studies. 1999, Vol. 30,

No. 3, pp. 513–532.

HECKMAN, J. J.; ICHIMURA H.; TODD P. 1997 Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator:

Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. The Review of Economic Studies. 1997,

Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 605–654.

JORGENSON, D. W.; HUNTER, J. M.; NADIRI, I. 1970. A Comparison of Alternative Econometric

Models of Quarterly Investment Behavior. Econometrica. 1970, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 187–212.

KRÁL, P. 2004. Identifi cation and Measurement of Relationships Concerning Inflow of FDI: The

Case of the Czech Republic. [CNB Working Papers 5/2004], http://ideas.repec.org/p/cnb/wpaper/2004-05.html.

LECHNER, M. 2000. An Evaluation of Public-Sector-Sponsored Continuous Vocational Training

Programs in East Germany. The Journal of Human Resources. 2000, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 347–375.

LIM, E. G. 2001. Determinants of, and Relation Between, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth:

A Summary of the Recent Literature. [Working Paper No. 01/175], IMF Working Papers,

Washington, 2001. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2001/wp01175.pdf.

OLLEY, S.; PAKES, A. 1996. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment

Industry. Econometrica. Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 1263–98.

SRHOLEC, M.; PLOJHAR, M. 2004. Politická ekonomie investičních pobídek. Politická ekonomie.

2004, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 451–464.

SRHOLEC, M. 2004. Přímé zahraniční investice v České republice. 1. vyd. Praha: Linde, 2004. ISBN: 80-86131-52-1

WELLS, L. T.; ALLEN N. J.; MORRISET, J.; PIRNIA, N. 2001. Using tax incentives to compete

for foreign investment: are they worth the costs? The International Finance Corporation

and the World Bank, 2001, ISBN: 978-0-8213-4992-2. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/


ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. 1998. Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Restructuring and Growth in

Manufacturing. Prague Economic Papers. 1998, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 329–345.