Politická ekonomie 2012, 60(3):362-379 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.854

Informační asymetrie a systém dvojího standardu ve vztahu zdravotník - pacient

Martin Janíčko, Ivo Koubek
1 Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.
2 Univerzita Karlova v Praze.

Information Assymetry and Double Standard in the Doctor-Patient Relationship

The aim of the article is to explore the doctor - patient relationship using the information asymmetry framework and principal-agent theory. From the perspective of economic exchange, this relationship is relatively specific, as an uneven rank and position of the agents involved play an important role here. It is argued that this unevenness arises from several different factors, such as education and qualification, work experience, path dependence, and the nature of goods and services provided. The relationship specificity is then discussed from a theoretical point of view while its most important elements are highlighted and put into a wider context. Further, market approach in healthcare system and healthcare services is partially debated and a simple model analyzing he "double-standard treatment is developed. Subsequently, this type of treatment is analyzed with the aid of vertical differentiation approach. Based on economic rationale, the authors claim that "medical knowledge/information obligation should play a crucial role in all healthcare services. This type of instrument is to be applicable for both parties in the doctor - patient relationship, as it may help overcome the inherently present information asymmetry by rendering the healthcare services provision more transparent.

Keywords: information asymmetry, healthcare services, industry entry, vertical differentiation, double standard, medical knowledge/information obligation
JEL classification: D8, D81, I11, I18, L15

Published: June 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janíčko, M., & Koubek, I. (2012). Information Assymetry and Double Standard in the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Politická ekonomie60(3), 362-379. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.854
Download citation

References

  1. AKERLOF, G. 1970. The Market for Lemons, Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism". Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.. 84, No. 3, pp. 488-500. Go to original source...
  2. ARROW, K. 1963. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 53, pp. 941-973.
  3. DEJONG, D. V.; FORSYTHE, R.; LUNDHOLM, R. J.; UECKER W. C. 1985. A Laboratory Investigation of the Moral Hazard Problem in an Agency Relationship. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23, pp. 81-120. Go to original source...
  4. DURAND, G. et al. 2000. Comment améliorer la prise en charge des soins dentaires de la population? Rapport (Module interprofessionnel de santé publique), Ecole Nationale de la Santé Publique, Rennes.
  5. FEHER, E.; GÄCHTER, S.; KIRCHSTEIGER, G. 1997. Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 437-459. Go to original source...
  6. GABSZEWICZ, J. J.; THISSE, J. F. 1979. Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 340-359. Go to original source...
  7. HAAS-WILSON, D.; GAYNOR, M. 1998. Physician Networks and Their Implications for Competition in Health Care Markets. Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 179-182. Go to original source...
  8. HADLEY, J. 2003. Sicker and Poorer - The Consequences of Being Uninsured: A Review of the Research on the Relationship between Health Insurance, Medical Care Use, Health, Work, and Income. Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 60, No. 2 Supplement, pp. 3-75. Go to original source...
  9. HANOUSEK, J.; PODPIERA, R. 2001. Do jaké míry jsou na českém kapitálovém trhu využívány neveřejné informace? Finance a úvěr, Vol. 51, No. 7-8, pp. 405-416.
  10. HAWKINS, D.; BEST, R.; CONEY, K. 1989. Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  11. HLAVÁČEK, J.; HLAVÁČEK, M. 2004. Petrohradský paradox a kardinální funkce užitku. Politická ekonomie, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 48-60. Go to original source...
  12. HLAVÁČEK, J.; HLAVÁČEK, M. 2007. Poptávková funkce na trhu s pojištěním: porovnání maximalizace paretovské pravděpodobnosti přežití s teorií EUT von Neumanna a Morgensterna a s prospektovou teorií Kahnemana a Tverského. Czech Economic Review, Acta Universitatis Carolinae Oeconomica, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 116-134.
  13. HLAVÁČEK, J.; HLAVÁČEK, M. 2010. Zobecněná mikroekonomie. Praha: Karolinum.
  14. HOTELLING, H. 1929. Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 41-57. Go to original source...
  15. HÖLMSTROM, B. 1979. Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 74-91. Go to original source...
  16. INDERST, R. 2008. ´Irresponsible Lending´ with a Better Informed Lender. Economic Journal 118, pp. 1499-1519 Go to original source...
  17. JANDA, K. 2009. Bankruptcies with Soft Budget Constraint. The Manchester School, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 430-460. Go to original source...
  18. JANDA, K. 2007. Instituce státní úvěrové podpory v České republice. [IES Working Paper 20/2007].
  19. JANDA, K. 2006. Lender and Borrower as Principal and Agent. IES Working Paper 24/2006.
  20. JANDA, K. 2002. Signalling and Underutilization of Import Quota and Voluntary Export Restraint. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 351-365. Go to original source...
  21. JANDA, K.; SVÁROVSKÁ, B. 2010. Investing into Microfinance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 483-510. Go to original source...
  22. KAPTCHUK et al. 2010. Placebos without Deception: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1-7. Go to original source...
  23. LAVOIE, M. 2004. L´économie postkeynésienne. Paris: La découverte, collection Repères. Go to original source...
  24. LONGO, R.; MIRALDO, M.; STREET, A. 2008. Price Regulation of Pluralistic Markets Subject to Provider Collusion. [CHE Research Paper 45], Centre for Health Economics, University of York, U.K.
  25. MANOVE, M.; PADILLA, J. A.; PAGANO, M. 1998. Collateral vs. Project Screening: A Model of Lazy Banks. [CSEF WP 10], Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy. Go to original source...
  26. MUSHKIN, S. J. 1958. Toward a Definition of Health Economics. Public Health Reports, Vol. 73, No. 9, pp. 785-794. Go to original source...
  27. NAEGELEN, F.; MOUGEOT, M. 1998. Asymétrie d´information et financement des hôpitaux. Une comparaison des modes d´organisation du système de santé. Revue économique, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 1323-1343. Go to original source...
  28. PHLIPS, L.; THISSE, J. 1982. Spatial Competition and the Theory of Differentiated Products: An Introduction. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1/2, pp. 1-11. Go to original source...
  29. ROTSCHILD, M.; STIGLITZ, J. E. 1976. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 629-649. Go to original source...
  30. SENGUPTA, R. 2011. Unholy Alliances in Healthcare Services. CUTSCentre for Competition Investment & Economic Regulation, Jaipur Printers P. Ltd., Jaipur, India.
  31. SHAKED, A.; SUTTON, J. 1982. Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 3-13. Go to original source...
  32. SHY, O. 1995. Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  33. ŠTIKA, P. 2009. Ekonomika a štěstí. Politická ekonomie, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 250-262. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.