Politická ekonomie 2013, 61(2):229-247 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.896

Faktory ovlivňující vstup do podnikání: začínající podnikatelé v České republice

Martin Lukeš, Jan Zouhar, Martina Jakl, Petr Očko
1 Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.
2 SwissCzech Technology Transfer.
3 Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu ČR.

Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Entry: Early-Stage Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic

The paper deals with early entrepreneurial activity of individuals. It is focused both on entrepreneurs owning and managing a young firm and on nascent entrepreneurs who do steps towards launching a new venture. Demographic, socioeconomic, psychological and other factors influencing early entrepreneurial activity were analyzed based on data gathered from representative samples of adult population in the Czech Republic in 2006 (n = 2 001) and 2011 (n = 2 005). Unlike some earlier work on the subject, binary choice models were used in order to quantify the ceteris paribus effects of individual factors. Results showed that, ceteris paribus, men, people with higher entrepreneurial self-efficacy and people who know somebody else, who has launched a new business recently, more often involved in early entrepreneurial activity. The probability of such involvement grew, depending on the utilized model, till 36 to 46 years of age and decreased onwards. For both the phase of nascent entrepreneurship and that of start-up management, entrepreneurial status in society and the level of education were insignificant. Region and fear of failure played a larger role in nascent entrepreneurship, while gender and household income were significant factors related to the next phase of launching and managing a new business. Gender inequality related to start-up early management in between 2006 and 2011 increased. Overall, the study (1) shows robust findings concerning entrepreneurial entry in the Czech Republic, (2) differentiates between factors influencing nascent entrepreneurs and start-up owner-managers, and (3) provides policy recommendations for mitigating the negative role of entrepreneurial activity inhibiting factors.

Keywords: nascent entrepreneurs, start-up owner-managers, new ventures, binary choice models, entrepreneurial self-efficacy
JEL classification: J24, L26, M13

Published: April 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lukeš, M., Zouhar, J., Jakl, M., & Očko, P. (2013). Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Entry: Early-Stage Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic. Politická ekonomie61(2), 229-247. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.896
Download citation

References

  1. ACS, Z. J.; ARENIUS, P.; HAY, M.; MINNITI, M. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2004 Executive Report. Babson College and London Business School.
  2. AI, C.; NORTON, E. C. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters. 2003, Vol. 80, No. 1, 123-129. Go to original source...
  3. ANGRIST, J.; PISCHKE, J.-S. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. London: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  4. BERRY, F. S.; BERRY, W. D. 1991. Specifying a model of state policy innovation. The American Political Science Review. 1991, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 571-579. Go to original source...
  5. BERRY, W. D.; DEMERITT, J. H. R.; ESAREY, J. 2010. Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science. 2010, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 248-266. Go to original source...
  6. BOSMA, N.; WENNEKERS, S.; AMOROS, J.E. (2012). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2011 Extended Report. Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Employees Across the Globe. www. gemconsorium.org
  7. BRAMBOR T.; CLARK C. W.; GOLDER, M. 2006. Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis. 2006, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 63-82. Go to original source...
  8. CASSAR, G. 2006. Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 610-632. Go to original source...
  9. CURRIE, J.; GRUBER, J., 1996. Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care, and child health. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1996, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 431-466. Go to original source...
  10. DAVIDSSON, P.; KIRCHHOFF, B.; HATEMI J. A.; GUSTAVSSON, H. 2002. Empirical analysis of growth factors using Swedish data. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 332-349. Go to original source...
  11. DAVIDSSON, P. 2006. Nascent entrepreneurship: empirical studies and developments. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-76. Go to original source...
  12. DAVIDSSON, P.; GORDON, S. R. 2009. Nascent entrepreneur(ship) research: a review. QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/
  13. DAVIDSSON, P.; HONIG, B. L. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 301-331. Go to original source...
  14. DELMAR, F.; DAVIDSSON, P. 2000. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-23. Go to original source...
  15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2009. Flash Eurobarometer: Entrepreneurship in the EU and beyond.
  16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003. Green Paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
  17. GREENE, W. 2010. Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters. 2010, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 291-296. Go to original source...
  18. GROCHOVÁ, L.; OTÁHAL, T. 2010. Podnikání a ekonomický rozvoj: jaký je rozdíl mezi neorakouskou a novou institucionální ekonomií? Politická ekonomie, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 623-640. Go to original source...
  19. HOFER, A. et al. 2010. From Strategy to Practice in University Entrepreneurship Support: Strengthening Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development in Eastern Germany: Youth, Entrepreneurship and Innovation", OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Working Papers, 2010/09, OECD Publishing. Go to original source...
  20. HORRACE, W. C.; OAXACA, R. L. 2006. Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Economics Letters. Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 321-327. Go to original source...
  21. HUŠEK, R. 2009. Aplikovaná ekonometrie - teorie a praxe. Praha: Oeconomica.
  22. KOELLINGER, P.; MINNITI, M. 2006. Not for lack of trying - American entrepreneurship in black and white. Small Business Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 59-79. Go to original source...
  23. KIM, P.; ALDRICH, H.; KEISTER, L. 2006. Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 5-22. Go to original source...
  24. LUKEŠ, M.; NOVÝ, I. A KOL. 2005. Psychologie podnikání. Praha: Management Press.
  25. LUKEŠ, M.; JAKL, M. 2007. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Podnikatelská aktivita v ČR. Národní zpráva 2006. Praha: VŠE.
  26. LUKEŠ, M.; JAKL, M. 2012. Podnikání v České republice. Praha: Oeconomica.
  27. LUKEŠ, M.; STEPHAN, U. 2012. Nonprofit leaders and for-profit entrepreneurs: similar people with different motivation. Československá psychologie, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 41-55.ˇ
  28. LUKEŠ, M. 2013 Entrepreneurs as innovators: a multi-country study on entrepreneurs' innovative behavior. Prague Economic Papers. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 72-84. Go to original source...
  29. MORIANO, J. A.; GORGIEVSKI, M.; LAGUNA, M.; STEPHAN, U.; ZARAFSHANI, K. 2012. A CrossCultural Approach to Understanding Entrepreneurial Intention. Journal of Career Development, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 162-185. Go to original source...
  30. MUELLER, P. 2006. Entrepreneurship in the region: breeding ground for nascent entrepreneurs? Small Business Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 41-58. Go to original source...
  31. NAGLER, J. 1991. The effect of registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 1393-1405. Go to original source...
  32. PILKOVÁ, A.; KOVAČICOVÁ, Z.; HOLIENKA, M.; REHÁK, J., 2012. Podnikanie na Slovensku: vysoká aktivita, nízke rozvojové ašpirácie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
  33. RAUCH, A.; FRESE, M. 2000. Psychological Approaches to Entrepreneurial Success: A General Model and an Overview of Findings. In C. L.COOPER and I. T. ROBERTSON: International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology. Vol. 15, John Wiley & Sons.
  34. RAUCH, A. 2010. Dispositions of entrepreneurs: Exploring entrepreneurs' personality characteristics. In: M. Lukeš a M. Laguna (Eds.) Entrepreneurship: A Psychological Approach. Praha: Oeconomica.
  35. REYNOLDS, P. D.; CURTIN, R. T. 2008. Business creation in the United States: Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II initial assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 155-307. Go to original source...
  36. SHIROKOVA, G.; VEGA, G.; BUT, I. 2012. Comparison of social network influence on 3 stages of entrepreneurial firm development: Evidence from Russian GEM data. Paper presented at 32nd SMS conference, Praha 5.-9.10.
  37. VAN GELDEREN, M.; THURIK, R.; BOSMA, N. 2005. Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 365-380. Go to original source...
  38. VAN PRAAG, C. M.; VERSLOOT, P. H. 2007. The economic benefits and costs of entrepreneurship: A review of the research. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 65-154. Go to original source...
  39. VAN STEL, A.; CARREE, M.; THURIK, R. 2005. The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. Jena: MPI. Go to original source...
  40. WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. 2002. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd edition. Cincinnati: South-Western College Pub.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.