Politická ekonomie 2013, 61(5):583-604 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.918

Kontroverzní pojem národní konkurenceschopnost a výsledky zemí V-4 v mezinárodních žebříčcích konkurenceschopnosti 2007-2012

Marta Nečadová, Jindřich Soukup
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

The Controversial Concept of National Competitiveness and the Results of the Visegrad Group in International Rankings of Competitiveness (2007-2012)

The first objective of this paper is to identify the differences between microeconomic and macroeconomic concepts of competitiveness. The second objective is to explain why the concept of national competitiveness is controversial and why the obsession with competitiveness has adverse impacts on the allocation of resources and the choice of economic policies. The third goal is to describe and evaluate the methodology of the best known international rankings of competitiveness (World Competitiveness Yearbook and The Global Competitiveness Report). In the fourth section of this paper we use data published in this rankings to analyse changes in competitiveness of the Visegrad Group economies in 2007 - 2012.

Keywords: competitiveness, recession, Visegrad group, World Competitiveness Yearbook, Global Competitiveness Report, Global Competitiveness Index
JEL classification: E20, L21

Published: October 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nečadová, M., & Soukup, J. (2013). The Controversial Concept of National Competitiveness and the Results of the Visegrad Group in International Rankings of Competitiveness (2007-2012). Politická ekonomie61(5), 583-604. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.918
Download citation

References

  1. BENEŠ, M. 2006. Konkurenceschopnost a konkurenční výhoda. [Working paper No. 5/2006] Brno: Centrum výzkumu konkurenční schopnosti české ekonomiky, 2006. ISSN 1801-4496. Dostupné na http://is.muni.cz/do/econ/soubory/oddeleni/centrum/papers/wp2006-05.pdf.
  2. BALCAROVÁ, P.; BENEŠ, M. 2006. Metodologie měření a hodnocení makroekonomické konkurenceschopnosti. [Working paper No. 9/2006] Brno: Centrum výzkumu konkurenční schopnosti české ekonomiky, 2006. ISSN 1801-4496. Dostupné na http://is.muni.cz/do/econ/soubory/oddeleni/centrum/papers/wp2006-09.pdf.
  3. BOBÁKOVÁ, V.; HEČKOVÁ, J. 2007. Teoretické aspekty definovania a analýza konkurencieschopnosti zpracovatelského priemyslu SR. Politická ekonomie. 2007, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp.490-507. Go to original source...
  4. BREŇOVÁ, L.; NEČADOVÁ, M.; SOUKUP, J. 2012. Impact of the New Economy on the Competitiveness of the Visegrad Group Countries (with an emphasis on the Czech Republic). Slaný: Melandrium, 2012. 82 p. ISBN 978-80-86175-78-2.
  5. CES VŠEM, NOZV NVF. 2011. Konkurenční schopnost České republiky 2010-2011. Praha: Linde 2011, 468 p. ISBN 978-80-7201-871-0.
  6. EZEALA-HARRISON, F. 2005. On the competing notions of international competitiveness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 2005. Dostupné na http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Advances-in-Competitiveness-Research/138408289.html.
  7. GARELLI, S. 2006. Top Class Competitors (How Nations, firms and individuals succeed in the new world of competitiveness). Chichester: John Wiley&Sons, Ltd., 2006. 272 p. ISBN 0-470-02569-7.
  8. IMD. 2007-2011. World Competitiveness Yearbook. IMD, 2007-2011. www.imd.org.
  9. ITIF. 2010. The 2008 State New Economy Index (2010). Washington, DC: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2010.
  10. JÍLEK, J. 2000. Návrhy ukazatelů nové (digitální) ekonomiky. Statistika. 2000, Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 197-216.
  11. KLVAČOVÁ, E. 2008a. Různé cesty ke konkurenceschopnosti: EU versus USA. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2008. ISBN 978-80-86946-84-9.
  12. KLVAČOVÁ, E.; MALÝ, J. 2008b. Domnělé a skutečné bariéry konkurenceschopnosti EU a ČR. Praha: Vzdělávací středisko na podporu demokracie, 2008. 100 p., ISBN 978-80-903122-8-9.
  13. KLVAČOVÁ, E.; MALÝ, J.; MRÁČEK, K.; DOSTÁLOVÁ, I. 2008c. Fenomén dobývání renty a jeho vliv na české veřejné finance. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2008. 270 p. ISBN 978-80-86946-75-7.
  14. KRUGMAN, P. R.1994. Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs. 1994, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 28-44. Dostupné na http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctpvhg/ECON1005/Readings/Krug%20comp.pdf. Go to original source...
  15. KRUGMAN, P. R. 1996. Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 17-25. Go to original source...
  16. KRUGMAN, P. R. 2011. The Competition Myth. Dostupné na http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2011/01/paul-krugman-the-competition-myth.html.
  17. KRUGMAN, P. R. 2013. The big Fail. New York Times, 6. 1. 2013. Dostupné na http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/opinion/krugman-the-big-fail.html?ref=paulkrugman op-ed columnist.
  18. LÍZAL, L. 2006. Zamyšlení nad publikací Ročenka konkurenceschopnosti ČR 2005. Politická ekonomie. 2006, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 549-556.
  19. MALÝ, J.; WAWROSZ, P.; MRÁČEK, K.; DOSTÁLOVÁ, I. 2011. Globalizace integrace a české národní zájmy. Praha: Professional Publishing, 2011. 247 p. ISBN 978-80-7431-061-4.
  20. NERV. 2011. Zpráva NERVu o konkurenceschopnosti - únor 2011. Praha: Vláda ČR, 2011. http://www.vlada.cz/assets/media-centrum/aktualne/NERV_kap01.pdf
  21. PAVELKA, T. 2011. Dopad ekonomické recese na ekonomickou aktivitu cizinců v České republice. Ekonomické listy. 2011, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 14-25.
  22. PORTER, M. E.1998. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, MacMillan, 1998. Go to original source...
  23. PORTER, M. E.; DELGADO, M.; KETELS, C.; STERN, S. 2008. Moving to a New Global Competitiveness Index, In Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009.Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2008. pp. 43-63.
  24. SINE. 2000. Statistical Indicators for the New Economy. Brusels: Eurostat, 2000.
  25. EUROSTAT. 2005. The EU-15´s New Economy - A statistical portrait. Luxembourg: European Communities, Brussels, Eurostat, Working Papers and Studies, 2005.
  26. PROGRESSIVE POLICY INSTITUTE. 1999. The 1999 State New Economy Index (1999). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 1999.
  27. PROGRESSIVE POLICY INSTITUTE. 2002. The 2002 State New Economy Index (2002). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 2002.
  28. SIGGEL, E. 2007. International competitiveness and comparative advantage: a survey and proposal for measurement. CESifo Venice Summer Institute, 20-21. 7. 2007, 33 p. Dostupné na http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/CFP_CONF/CFP_CONF_VSI/VSI%202007/vsi07_Papers_MDC/vsi07_mdc_degrauwe_Siggel_p2.pdf.
  29. SLANÝ, A. a kol. 2006. Konkurenceschopnost české ekonomiky (vývojové trendy). Brno (CVKS): Printeco s.r.o., 2006. ISBN: 80-210-4157-9. Dostupné na http://is.muni.cz/do/econ/soubory/oddeleni/centrum/konkurenceschopnost_ceske_ekonomiky.pdf
  30. TRUNEČEK, J. 2009. K problematice konkurenceschopnosti českých podniků v prostředí turbulence. Politická ekonomie, 2009, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 435-450. Go to original source...
  31. VINTROVÁ, R. 2010. Dopady recese na ekonomickou pozici a konkurenceschopnost zemí EU-5. Ekonomické listy, CES VŠEM 2010, Vol.1, No. 5, pp. 3-15.
  32. VINTROVÁ, R. 2010. Interpretační omezení HDP a alternativní ukazatele [Working paper No. 6/2010]. Praha: Centrum výzkumu konkurenční schopnosti české ekonomiky. 2010. 43p. ISSN 1801-4496.
  33. VODÁČEK, L.; VODÁČKOVÁ, O. 1996. Management, teorie a praxe pro 90. léta. Praha: Management Press, 1996. 245 p. ISBN 80-85943-19-0.
  34. WEF. 2007-2012. The Global Competitiveness Report. WEF, 2007-2012. www.weforum.org/issues/ global-competitiveness
  35. ŽÁK, M. a kol. 2002. Ekonomická encyklopedie. Praha: Linde Praha, a. s., 2002. ISBN: 80-7201-381-5.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.