Politická ekonomie 2014, 62(6):749-768 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.980

Dopady reformy přímých daní k roku 2015: vyhodnocení pomocí modelu TAXBEN

Libor Dušek, Klára Kalíšková, Daniel Münich
1 CERGE-EI a VŠE.
2 CERGE-EI.

The Impacts of the 2015 Reform of Direct Taxation: Evaluation with a TAXBEN Model

The Czech Parliament approved a wide-ranging reform of direct taxes in 2011. Absent other legislative changes, the reform will come into force on January 1, 2015. We evaluate its impacts on the tax burdens and the average and marginal tax rates in a representative sample of Czech individuals and households. The main impact of the reform is a reduction in the average tax rates for the self-employed in the 5th through 10th income deciles, most frequently by 4.4 percentage points. The variation in the change in the average tax rates among the self-employed in low incomes deciles is large and varies between minus 5 to plus 5 percentage points. The reform would reduce the taxes for most employees only slightly but it would increase the average tax rate by up to 5 percentage points for employees with earnings exceeding four times the average wage. The effective marginal tax rates faced by the self-employed would drop most commonly by either 4.4 or 10-11 percentage points, while the effective marginal tax rates faced by employees would remain unchanged. The impacts on the households are highly heterogeneous depending on the share of income from self-employment in the household's total income. The reform would reduce the budget revenues by approximately CZK 19 billion.

Keywords: Czech Republic, tax reform, impact evaluation, TAXBEN model
JEL classification: D31, H22, H24

Published: December 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dušek, L., Kalíšková, K., & Münich, D. (2014). The Impacts of the 2015 Reform of Direct Taxation: Evaluation with a TAXBEN Model. Politická ekonomie62(6), 749-768. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.980
Download citation

References

  1. BULUTOGLU, K. 1995. Presumptive Taxation, in SHOME, P. (ed) Tax Policy Handbook, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
  2. DUŠEK, L.; KALÍŠKOVÁ, K.; A MÜNICH, D. 2013. Distribution of average, marginal, and participation tax rates among Czech taxpayers: Results from a TAXBEN model. Finance a úvěr, 2013, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 475-504.
  3. DUŠEK, L.; KALÍŠKOVÁ, K.; A MÜNICH, D. 2014. The poor or the kids? Distributional impacts of taxes and benefits among Czech households. [Working paper CERGE-EI], dostupný na http://idea.cerge-ei.cz/files/taxben_hh_11_2013.pdf. Prague Economic Papers (forthcoming).
  4. GALUŠČÁK, K.; PAVEL, J. 2012. Taxes and Benefits: Work Incentive Effects of Policies. Finance a úvěr, 2012, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 27-43.
  5. IMMERVOLL, H. 2004. Average and marginal effective tax rates facing workers in the EU: A micro-level analysis of levels, distributions and driving factors. [OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 19], OECD Publishing.
  6. KLAZAR, S.; SLINTÁKOVÁ, B. 2012. How progressive is the Czech social security? Prague Economic Papers, 2012, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 309-327. Go to original source...
  7. MIRRLEES, J. A. (ed.) 2010a. Tax by design: The Mirrlees review. Oxford University Press.
  8. MIRRLEES, J. A. (ed.) 2010b. Dimensions of tax design: The Mirrlees review. Oxford University Press.
  9. PAVEL, J. 2009. Dopady změn v daňovém a dávkovém systému v letech 2004-2008 na hodnoty ukazatelů motivace k práci v ČR. [Ministerstvo financí ČR, výzkumná studie 1/2009].
  10. SAEZ, E.; SLEMROD, J.; A GIERTZ, S. H. 2012. The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 3-50. Go to original source...
  11. SCHNEIDER, O.; JELÍNEK, T. 2004. Distributive Impact of Czech Social Security and Tax Systems in Early 2000's. [IES Working Paper No. 67]. Go to original source...
  12. YITZHAKI, S. 2007. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Presumptive Taxation, FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 2007, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 311-326. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.