Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(1):57-73 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.988

Rakouská teorie hospodářského cyklu: VAR analýza pro USA v letech 1978-2013

Martin Komrska
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

The Austrian Business Cycle Theory: VAR Analysis for USA between 1978-2013

The aim of this paper is to empirically investigate the explanatory power of Austrian business cycle theory (ABCT). My dataset consists of US quarterly time series within the period 1978-2013. Following Wainhouse (1984), Keeler (2001) and others I employ Granger causality as one of the primary tools of the analysis. Furthermore I also add impulse response functions to analyse the observed relations in closer detail. Two main hypotheses were tested. First one analyses how changes in interest rate affects relative proportion of investment and consumption outlays. Second hypothesis investigates how labour resources are reallocated as a consequence of an increase in interest rate. In both hypotheses, two concepts of interest rate were employed. Application of "explicit" interest rate does not seem to generate significant results. On the contrary, results fit in the Austrian story much better when implicit rate is employed. The traditional version of ABCT, which relies more on explicit interest rates, seems to suffer from invalid assumption about the allocation of credit during expansionary phase of business cycle.

Keywords: VAR, structure of production, impulse response, implicit interest rate, Granger causality, business cycle, ABCT
JEL classification: C32, E32, E43

Published: February 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Komrska, M. (2015). The Austrian Business Cycle Theory: VAR Analysis for USA between 1978-2013. Politická ekonomie, 63(1), 57-73. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.988
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AMATO, J. D. 2005. The Role of the Natural Rate of Interest in Monetary Policy. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper. 2005, No. 171. Go to original source...
    2. BERNANKE, B. 2010. Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble. Paper for the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Atlanta, Georgia, January 2010.
    3. BISMAS, F.; MOUGEOT, C. 2009. Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Empirical Evidence. Review of Austrian Economics. 2009, Vol. 22, pp. 241-257. Go to original source...
    4. BJERKENES, H.; KIIL,H.; ANKER-NILLSEN, P. 2010. Austrian Economics: Application on Norwegian Business Cycles. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration Master Thesis. 2010.
    5. BJORNLAND, H. C.; LEITEMO, K.; MAIH, J. 2011. Estimating the Natural Rates in a Simple New Keynesian Framework. Empirical Economics. 2011, Vol. 40, pp. 755-777. Go to original source...
    6. CARILLI, A. M.; DEMPSTER, G. M. 2008. Is the Austrian Business Cycle Theory still Relevant? Review of Austrian Economics. 2008, Vol. 21, pp. 271-181. Go to original source...
    7. COVEY, T.; BESSLER, D. A. 1992. Testing for Granger's Full Causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1992, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 146-153. Go to original source...
    8. DE SOTO, J. H. 2009. Money, Bank Credit, and Business cycles. 2. ed. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009. ISBN 978-1-933550-39-8.
    9. FIORE, F.; TRISTANI, O. 2011. Credit and the Natural Rate of Interest. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2011, Vol. 43, No. 2-3, pp. 407-440. Go to original source...
    10. GARRISON, R. W. 2001. Time and Money. New York: Routledge, 2010. ISBN 0-415-07982-9.
    11. GARRISON, R. W. 2004. Overconsumption and Forced Saving in the Mises-Hayek Theory of the Business Cycle. History of Political Economy. 2004, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 323-349. Go to original source...
    12. GRANGER, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica. 1969, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 424-438. Go to original source...
    13. GUJARATI, D. N. 2004. Basic Econometrics. 4th edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2004.
    14. HABERLER, G. 1996. Money and the Business Cycle. In EBELING, R. (ed.): The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute. 1996, pp. 37-64.
    15. HAYEK, F. A. 1933. Monetary Theory and Trade Cycle. London: Jonathan Cape, 1933.
    16. HAYEK, F. A. 1935. Prices and Production, 2. edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1935.
    17. HAYEK, F. A. 1969. Three Elucidations of the Ricardo Effect. Journal of Political Economy. 1969, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 274-285. Go to original source...
    18. HAYEK, F. A. 1983. Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Friedrich A. von Hayek, Oral History Program. Los Angeles: Regents of the University of California, 1983.
    19. HOTT, C.; JOKIPII, T. 2012. Housing Bubbles and Interest Rates. Swiss National Bank Working Paper 7/2012.
    20. KEELER, J. P. 2001. Empirical Evidence of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory. Review of Austrian Economics. 2001, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 331-351. Go to original source...
    21. KOLLAR, M. 2013. A Sketch of Macro-based Asset Allocation. International Journal of Economic Sciences. 2013, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 101-120.
    22. KYDLAND. F.; PRESCOTT, E. 1990. Business Cycles: Real Facts and Monetary Myth. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review. 1990, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 3-18. Go to original source...
    23. LAUBACH, T.; WILLIAMS, J. C. 2003. Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2003, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 1063-1070. Go to original source...
    24. MESONNIER, J. S. 2011. The Forecasting Power of Real Interest Rate Gaps: An Assessment for the Euro Area. Applied Economics. 2011, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 153-172. Go to original source...
    25. MISES, L. VON. 1953. The Theory of Money and Credit. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
    26. MISES, L. VON. 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1998.
    27. MITCHELL, D. W. 1979. Explicit and Implicit Demand Deposit Interest: Substitutes or Complements from the Bank's Point of View? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1979, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 182-191. Go to original source...
    28. MULLIGAN, R. 2006. An Empirical Examination of Austrian Business Cycle Theory. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2006, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 69-93. Go to original source...
    29. NEISS, K. S.; NELSON, E. 2003. The Real-interest-rate Gap as an Inflation Indicator. Macroeconomic Dynamics. 2003, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7, pp. 239-262. Go to original source...
    30. PRUŠVIC, D. 2010. Evropská fiskální pravidla a jejich účinnost: prvních 15 let. Politická ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 579-600. Go to original source...
    31. REINHART, C. M.; ROGOFF, K. S. 2013. Shifting Mandates: The Federal Reserve's First Centennial. American Economic Review. 2013, Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 48-54. Go to original source...
    32. REVENDA, Z. 2009. Monopoly centrálních bank a emise peněz. Politická ekonomie. 2009, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 579-600. Go to original source...
    33. SCHULARICK, M.; TAYLOR, A. 2012. Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles, and Financial Crises 1870-2008. American Economic Review. 2012, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 1029-61. Go to original source...
    34. SKOUSEN, M. 1990. The Structure of Production. New York: New York University Press, 1990.
    35. SUMMERS, P. M. 2005. What Caused The Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Third Quarter 2005, pp. 5-32.
    36. TAYLOR, J. B. 2009. The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong. NBER Working Paper, January 2009, No. 14631. Go to original source...
    37. TEMPELMAN, J. H. 2010. Austrian Business Cycle Theory and the Global Financial Crisis: Confessions of a Mainstream Economist. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3-15.
    38. WAINHOUSE, C. E. 1984. Empirical Evidence for Hayek's Theory of Economic Fluctuations. In SIEGEL, B. (ed.). Money in Crisis. San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research. 1984, pp. 37-71.
    39. WEBER, A. 2006. The Role of Interest Rates in Theory and Practice - How Useful Is the Concept of the Natural Real Rate of Interest for Monetary Policy? BIS Review. 2006, Vol. 18, pp. 1-9.
    40. WOODS JR., T. 2009. Meltdown. Washington DC: Regnery Publishing. ISBN: 978-1-59698-587-2.
    41. YOUNG, A. T. 2005. Reallocating Labor to Initiate Changes in Capital Structures: Hayek Revisited. Economics Letters. 2005, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 275-282. Go to original source...
    42. ZAMRAZILOVÁ, E. 2011. Měnová politika: staré lekce, nové výzvy. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 3-21. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content