Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
Politická ekonomie
TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS • ISSN 0032-3233 (Print) • ISSN 2336-8225 (Online)

Politická ekonomie Vol. 59 No. 6

Ekonomie budoucnosti: čtyři možné scénáře

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.819

[plný text (PDF)]

Lukáš Kovanda

Already during the financial crisis from 2007 through 2009, a growing number of scholars, laymen or media outlets blamed economics as such, at least partially, for the turmoil and subsequent economic malaise. Therefore, the debate concerning future long-term development of economics - or, more precisely, prevailing economic theory - has been intensifying. The following text outlines four possible scenarios - synthetic, evolutionary, reactionary, and revolutionary - of such a development. Each scenario is connected with a methodologist of economics or a methodologist of science, who represent it, for it is right the domain of methodology or/and philosophy of science wherein it is necessary to look for an ideological background belonging to different research traditions in economics as well as for an understanding of determining stances and worldviews of the traditions' proponents.

JEL klasifikace: B29, B30, B41, B50

Reference:
AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. 2001. From Unity to Dispersion: The body in modern economic

discourse. In CULLENBERG, S.; AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001, s. 143-65. ISBN: 978-0415110266.

BEED, C. 2005. Naturalised Epistemology and Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2005,

Vol. 29, pp. 99–117.

BEED, C.; BEED, C. 2000. The Status of Economics as a Naturalistic Social Science. Cambridge

Journal of Economics. 2000, Vol. 24, pp. 417–35.

BENJAMIN, D.; LAIBSON, D. 2003. Good Policies for Bad Governments: Behavioral Political Economy. Studie prezentovaná na konferenci Boston Fed Conference on Behavioral Economics

v červnu 2003.

BEZEMER, D. 2009. No One Saw This Coming: Understanding Financial Crisis Through Accounting

Models. MPRA, studie č. 15892.

BHASKAR, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. 2. vyd. Brighton: Harvester, 1978. ISBN: 0391005766.

BLAUG, M. 1998. Disturbing Currents in Modern Economics. Challenge. 1998, 41, s. 11–34.

CALDWELL, B. J. 1994. Beyond Positivism. 3. vyd. London: Routledge, 1994. ISBN: 0415109116.

CAPRA, F. 1983. The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture. New York: Bantam,

1983. ISBN: 978-0553345728.

CAPRA, F. 2004. Tkáň života. Praha: Academia, 2004. ISBN: 80-200-1169-2.

CASTILLO, C. 1996. Muddling Through: One Way to Make Political Change, News Release, Stanford

GSB, září 1996.

CHICK, V. 1998. „Order out of Chaos“ in Economics. In DOW, S. C.; HILLARD, J. (eds.) Keynes,

Knowledge and Uncertainty. Aldershot: Edward Edgar, 1998. ISBN 978-1852788735.

COLANDER, D. 2005. The Future of Economics: The Appropriately Educated in Pursuit of the

Knowable. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2005, Vol. 29, pp. 927–41.

CULLENBERG, S.; DASGUPTA, I. 2001. From Myth to Metaphor. In CULLENBERG, S.; AMARIGLIO,

J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001,

s. 337–53.

DOW, S. C. 1980. Methodological Morality in the Cambridge Controversies. Journal of Post

Keynesian Economics, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 368–80.

DOW, S. C. 1996. The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought. 2. vyd. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar,

1996. ISBN: 1852789808.

DOW, S. C. 2001. Modernism and Postmodernism: A Dialectical Analysis. In CULLENBERG S.;

AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge, London:

Routledge, 2001.

HANDS, D. W. 2001. Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science

Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. ISBN: 978-0521797962.

HAUSMAN, D. 1998. Economics, Philosophy of. In CRAIG, E. (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of

Philosophy (svazek III). London: Routledge, 1998. ISBN 978-0415073108.

KOVANDA, L. 2006. Momenty fi lozofi e věd v komparaci škol ekonomického myšlení. Diplomová

práce, vedoucí: M. Sojka. Praha: Institut ekonomických studií FSV UK, 2006.

KOVANDA, L. 2009. Příběh dokonalé bouře a hovory (nejen) s laureáty Nobelovy ceny o finanční

krizi. Praha: Mediacop, 2009. ISSN 1804-1701.

KOVANDA, L. 2010. Kritický realismus: ontologická báze postkeynesovské ekonomie. Politická

ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 608–22. ISSN 0032-3233.

KOVANDA, L. 2011. Příběh dluhové smršti a hovory (nejen) s laureáty Nobelovy ceny o dopadech

finanční krize. Praha: Mediacop, 2011. ISSN 1804-1701.

KLAMER, A. 2001. Late Modernism and the Loss of Character in Economics. In CULLENBERG,

S.; AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London:

Routledge, 2001, s. 77–101.

LAWSON, T. 2003. Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge, 2003. ISBN: 978-0415253352.

LAWSON, T. 2006. The Nature of Heterodox Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2006,

Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 483–505.

MCCLOSKEY, D. 2001. The Genealogy of Postmodernism: An Economist’s Guide. In CULLENBERG,

S.; AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London:

Routledge, 2001, s. 102–28.

NELSON, J. 2001. Feminist Economics: Objective, Activist, and Postmodern? In CULLENBERG,

S.; AMARIGLIO, J.; RUCCIO, D. (eds.) Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London:

Routledge, 2001, s. 286–304.

PASINETTI, L. L. 2005. The Cambridge School of Keynesian Economics. Cambridge Journal

of Economics. 2005, Vol. 29, pp. 837–48.

PHEBY, J. 1988. Methodology and Economics: A Critical Introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke,

Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 1988. ISBN: 033338511X.

PRIGOGINE, I.; STENGERS, I. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London:

Heineman, 1984. ISBN: 978-0553340822.

SAMUELSON, P. 1997. Credo of a Lucky Textbook Author. Journal od Economic Perspectives.

Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 153–60.

SIMON, H. 1957. Administrative Behavior. 2. vyd. New York: The Free Press, 1957. ASIN:

B001ECZAWG.

SMITH, A. 1759 [2001]. Teorie mravních citů. Praha: Liberální institut, 2001. ISBN: 80-86389-38-3.

THALER, R.; SUNSTEIN, C. 2003. Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review. Vol. 93,

No. 2, pp. 175–79.

VELUPILLAI, K. V. 2005. The Unreasonable Ineffectivness of Mathematics in Economics. Cambridge

Journal of Economics. 2005, Vol. 29, pp. 849–72.