Central European Business Review Vol. 2 No. 2

Different Shades of Green: Comparative Study on Nature Relatedness and Ecologic Consciousness among South Korean, Swiss, and Czech Students

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.41

[plný text (PDF)]

Petra Y. Barthelmess, Mathias Schüz, Rainer Fuchs, Dušan Kučera, Markus Prandini

N/A

JEL klasifikace: J17, M14, Q56, Z12

Reference:
Allen, J. B., Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test

of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31, 338-353.



Braungart, M., McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to Cradle – Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.



Bruun, O., Kalland , A. (1995). Asian Perceptions of Nature. A Critical Approach. London: Curzon Press.



Callicott, J.B., Ames, R. T. (1985). The Asian Tradition as a Conceptual Resource for Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York.



Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational defi nition, in Identity and the natural environment: The psychological signifi cance of nature, ed. Clayton,S., Opotow, C., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 45-65.



Colon, R. L. (2008). Religious Groups and Climate Change. Drivers, Barriers and Religious Engagement on Climate Change. Lund: IIIEE Publications.



Conn, S. A. (1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 26 (1-3), 179-198.



Crawford, D. (2005). The Balanced Scorecard and Corporate Social Responsibility: Aligning Values for Profi t, (accessed September 25, 2012), [available at http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2005/10/23/balanced-scorecard-and-corporatesocial-responsibility-aligning-values-profit].



Descartes, R. (2008). Discourse on the Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.



Dunlap, R. E., VanLiere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.



Dunlap, R. E., Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues, 51, 121-137.



Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.



Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J.C., Luloff, A.E., Buttolph Johnson, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment & Behavior, 39, 474-493.



Frantz, C.M., Mayer, F.S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 205-222.



Glacken, C. J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Berkley: University of California Press.



Greenbiz Staff (2007). LOHAS Forum Sees Big Growth in Green Marketplace, (accessed May 23, 2012), [available at http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2007/05/29/lohas-forum-sees-big-growth-green-marketplace].



Howard, G. S. (1997). Ecological psychology: Creating a more earth-friendly human nature. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.



Iwata, O. (2001). Relationships between proenvironmental attitudes and concepts of nature. The Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 75-83.



Kaiser, F. G., Wölfi ng, S., Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.



Kals, E., Schumacher, D., Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202.



Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491-508.



Kellert, S. R, Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.



Klaus, V. (2007). Modrá, nikoli zelená planeta. Co je ohroženo: klima, nebo svoboda? Prague: Dokořán.



Kohak, E. (2006). Zelená svatozář, Kapitoly z ekologické etiky. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.



Kortenkamp, K. V., Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261-272.



Laszlo, E. (2008). Quantum Shift in the Global Brain – How the New Scientific Reality Can Change Us and Our World. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.



Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness of nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515.



Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment & Behavior, 41, 607-643.



Miller, G. T. (1972). Replenish the Earth: A Primer in Human Ecology. Florence, KY: Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc.



Mitchell, S. (1999). Lao Tzu. Tao Te Ching. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.



Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep ecology movements. Inquiry, 16, 95-100.



Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: linking individuals‘ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment & Behavior, 41, 715-740.



Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature. Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 303-322.



Nordlund, A. M., Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenviromental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740-756.



OECD. Programme for International Student Assessment (2009). Green at Fifteen? How 15-Year-Olds Perform in Environmental Science and Geoscience in Pisa 2006. Paris: OECD.



Pedersen, P. (1995). Nature, Religion, and Cultural Identity: The Religious Environmentalist Paradigm, in Asian Perceptions of Nature: A Critical Approach, ed. Bruun, O., Kalland, A., London: Curzon Press, 258-276.



Pelletier, L. G., Dion, S., Tuson, K., Green-Demers, I. (1999). Why do people fail to adopt environmental protective behavior? Toward a taxonomy of environmental amotivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2481-2504.



Pooley, J. A., O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behavior, 32, 711-723.



Rantanen, J. (2009). Reconnecting with Nature and Pro-Environmental Consciousness and Behavior. Lund: IIIEE publications.



Reid, T. R. (2000). Confucius lives next door. What living the East teaches us about living in the West. New York: Random House.

Schüz, M. (1986). Die Einheit des Wirklichen – Carl Friedrich v. Weizsäckers Denkweg. Pfullingen: Neske Verlag.



Schüz, M. (1999a). Die Einheit des Wirklichen – Denken und Handeln im Spannungsfeld von Physik und Religion, in Der Schöpfung auf der Spur – Theologie und Naturwissenschaft im Gespräch, ed. Audretsch, J., Nagorni, K., Karlsruhe, 9-33.



Schüz, M. (1999b). Werte – Risiko – Verantwortung. Dimensionen des Value Managements. München: Gerling Akademie Verlag.



Schüz, M. (2012). Sustainable Corporate Responsibility - The Foundation of Successful Business in the New Millennium. Central European Business Review, 1 (2), 7-15.



Sessions, G. (1987). Deep Ecology Movement. A Review. Environmental Review, 11 (2), 105-125.



Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (3), 65-84.



Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, C. (2000). Building Cross-Culture Competence. How to Create Wealth from Conflicting Values. Newhaven: Yale University Press.



White, L. (1973). The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, in Western Man and Environmental Ethics, ed. Barbour, I.G., Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.



Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.



World Economic Forum on East Asia (2009). Implications of the Global Economic Crisis for East Asia. Report on the WEF in Seoul, 18.-19. June 2009.



Yao Xinzhong (2000). An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weby Vysoké školy ekonomické v Praze využívají pro optimalizaci svého obsahu a poskytovaných služeb cookies. Prosíme o udělení souhlasu s jejich uložením.

Vyberte služby, pro které chcete povolit využívání cookies: